Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:23:23.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Subject: Psychology and Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

Ryan Bottary*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Tony J. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Rebecca M.C. Spencer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Edward F. Pace-Schott
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Social jetlag (SJ) occurs when sleep-timing irregularities from social or occupational demands conflict with endogenous sleep–wake rhythms. SJ is associated with evening chronotype and poor mental health, but mechanisms supporting this link remain unknown. Impaired ability to retrieve extinction memory is an emotion regulatory deficit observed in some psychiatric illnesses. Thus, SJ-dependent extinction memory deficits may provide a mechanism for poor mental health. To test this, healthy male college students completed 7–9 nights of actigraphy, sleep questionnaires, and a fear conditioning and extinction protocol. As expected, greater SJ, but not total sleep time discrepancy, was associated with poorer extinction memory. Unexpectedly, greater SJ was associated with a tendency toward morning rather than evening chronotype. These findings suggest that deficient extinction memory represents a potential mechanism linking SJ to psychopathology and that SJ is particularly problematic for college students with a greater tendency toward a morning chronotype.

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Fear extinction memory (i.e. remembering that something that once signaled danger no longer does so) is a form of emotion regulation that is strengthened by sleep (Pace-Schott, Germain et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Germain and Milad2015), but impaired in individuals with certain psychiatric illnesses such as post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and schizophrenia (Milad & Quirk, Reference Milad and Quirk2012). In addition to poor emotion regulation, psychopathology is often accompanied by poor sleep quality and is associated with evening chronotype (i.e. delayed bed- and rise-times) (Antypa et al., Reference Antypa, Vogelzangs, Meesters, Schoevers and Penninx2016) and sleep-pattern disruptions (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Peirson, Wulff, Winnebeck, Vetter and Roenneberg2013). Social jetlag (SJ) is a form of desynchrony between endogenous sleep–wake rhythms and actual sleep–wake timing imposed by social or occupational demands (Wittman et al., Reference Wittmann, Dinich, Merrow and Roenneberg2006). SJ is expressed as delayed sleep timing (i.e. later sleep midpoint) on weekends compared to weekdays. SJ is linked to psychopathology (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Peirson, Wulff, Winnebeck, Vetter and Roenneberg2013; Levandovski et al., Reference Levandovski, Dantas, Fernandes, Caumo, Torres, Roenneberg and Allebrandt2011), but mechanisms linking the two remain poorly understood.

Objective

In this secondary analysis of a larger study (Pace-Schott et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Spencer, Vijayakumar, Ahmed, Verga, Orr and Milad2013; Pace-Schott, Rubin et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Rubin, Tracy, Spencer, Orr and Verga2015), we extend our findings by measuring the association between SJ and extinction memory. Although sleep deprivation disrupts extinction memory (Pace-Schott, Germain et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Germain and Milad2015), little work has addressed the effects of sleep timing irregularities on retention of extinction memory. Here, we hypothesized that SJ represents a form of sleep-timing irregularity that might impair extinction memory, thus resulting in increased risk for psychopathology.

Methods

Seventy-six healthy male college students (aged 18–29) produced 7–9 nights of wrist actigraphy then completed a 2-session Fear Conditioning, Extinction Learning and Extinction Recall protocol (see Supplementary Materials for additional methodological details). SJ was determined by subtracting average weekday from weekend actigraphy-determined sleep midpoint (see Supplementary Materials for days included in averages and Table S1 for weekday and weekend mean sleep timing information). This calculation was then repeated for average total sleep time (TST). During Conditioning (occurring in the morning or evening) a finger-shock established anticipatory skin-conductance responses (SCR) to 2 differently colored lamps (CS+) but not a third (CS-). One CS+ (CS + E) but not the other (CS + U) was then immediately extinguished during Extinction. During Recall (3-, 12- or 24-hr after Extinction), all 3 CS were presented. Extinction memory was calculated separately for SCR (ERI) and differential SCR (dERI). The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Results

As predicted, SJ was negatively associated with ERI (r = −.248, p = .035) and dERI (r = −.280, p = .018) (See Figure 1). These associations were not driven by time-of-day of testing or recall delay and SJ did not correlate with non-extinction memory-related reactivity (see Supplementary Materials). Greater SJ was associated with higher Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) scores (Horne & Ostberg, Reference Horne and Östberg1976; r = .31, p = .007). Note, higher MEQ score indicates greater morningness, though only 2 participants qualified as moderate morning types (score between 59–69) and 1 as a definite morning type (score > 69) based on MEQ scoring criteria. MEQ was not correlated with ERI (r = −.13, p = .27) or dERI (r = −.12, p = .31). Lastly, difference in average weekend and weekday total sleep time was not associated with ERI (r = .03, p = .80) or dERI (r = .001, p = .99), suggesting the greater importance of weekday/weekend sleep timing differences versus weekday/weekend sleep-duration discrepancies.

Figure 1. Association between social jetlag (determined by subtracting weekday from weekend mean actigraphy-measured sleep midpoint expressed as minutes past midnight) and extinction memory determined by (a) Extinction Retention Index (ERI) and (b) differential ERI (dERI; corrects for general increases in reactivity) (see Supplementary Materials for ERI/dERI calculations). Note better memory for extinction is expressed as greater ERI or dERI.

Discussion

The present findings indicate that greater SJ is associated with poorer extinction memory, revealing one potential link between SJ and psychopathology. Higher SJ was also associated with greater morningness (See Figure 2), an observation that contrasts with previous reports that suggest evening types are more likely to experience SJ (e.g. Foster et al., Reference Foster, Peirson, Wulff, Winnebeck, Vetter and Roenneberg2013). That greater morningness did not directly correlate with extinction memory remains puzzling. Further, other studies have linked greater eveningness, rather than morningness, to impaired extinction memory-related processing (i.e. extinction generalization; Pace-Schott, Rubin et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Rubin, Tracy, Spencer, Orr and Verga2015) and psychopathology like depression (Levandovski et al., Reference Levandovski, Dantas, Fernandes, Caumo, Torres, Roenneberg and Allebrandt2011) and anxiety (Lemoine et al., Reference Lemoine, Zawieja and Ohayon2013). However, at least one study has linked morningness in males to greater neurotic-anxious personality traits (Muro et al., Reference Muro, Gomà-i-Freixanet and Adan2009) and morning-type college students report lower ratings of psychological quality of life compared with intermediate- and evening-type students (Lau et al., Reference Lau, Wong, Ng, Hui, Cheung and Mok2013). Late-night social schedules, especially on weekends, may disproportionately affect morning types by generating greater discrepancy between bedtimes on weekends and weekdays compared with evening types. Social jetlag, in turn, impaired emotion processing (i.e. extinction memory) and thus may be a vulnerability factor for poor mental health outcomes in those with morning chronotypes. Further, SJ appears to directly impact emotion processing rather than simply being a consequence of pre-existing psychopathology and late sleep timing, though further work is needed to confirm this.

Figure 2. Sleep timing on weekdays and weekends for evening types (ET) and intermediate-morning/morning types (IMT). Social jetlag (i.e. later sleep midpoint on weekends compared to weekdays) was greater in those with greater tendency toward morningness based on Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ; Horne and Ostberg, Reference Horne and Östberg1976) scores. Here, ET reflects averages across true evening types while IMT reflects averages across the upper half (higher MEQ scores, based on a median split) of intermediate types (Pace-Schott et al., Reference Pace-Schott, Germain and Milad2015). This split included 2 moderate morning types and 1 definite morning type based on Horne and Ostberg (Reference Horne and Östberg1976) scoring criteria. Note. MWD = average sleep midpoint on weekday nights; MWE = average sleep midpoint on weekend nights; TST = total sleep time.

Conclusions

Taken together, our observations suggest that, in young-adult male college students, greater morningness is a potential risk factor for SJ, which in turn is associated with impaired extinction memory. As both SJ and extinction memory deficits have been linked to poor mental health, SJ, expressed as delayed sleep timing on weekends compared to weekdays, may represent a particularly harmful sleeping pattern for optimal emotion regulation. Further, deficiencies in extinction memory may represent a specific mechanism linking SJ to poor mental health. Given that greater morningness was also associated with SJ, adopting greater coherence between weekend and weekday sleep timing may be particularly important for morning-type college students.

Author Contributions

EFPS and RMCS conceived and designed the study. EFPS conducted data gathering. RB and EFPS devised the secondary analysis plan and performed statistical analyses. RB, TJC, and EFPS drafted and revised the manuscript.

Financial Support

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH R21MH090357) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA R00AG029710).

Data Availability Statement

Readers can contact the authors if they wish to access relevant materials for replication. Detailed protocols are available in the Supplementary Materials and in Pace-Schott et al. (Reference Pace-Schott, Spencer, Vijayakumar, Ahmed, Verga, Orr and Milad2013) and Pace-Schott, Rubin et al. (Reference Pace-Schott, Rubin, Tracy, Spencer, Orr and Verga2015).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to report.

Supplementary Materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/exp.2020.26.

Acknowledgements.

Special thanks to Dr. Zoe S. Rubin, MD for her assistance with data processing and analysis.

References

Antypa, N., Vogelzangs, N., Meesters, Y., Schoevers, R., & Penninx, B. W. (2016). Chronotype associations with depression and anxiety disorders in a large cohort study. Depression and Anxiety, 33, 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. G., Peirson, S. N., Wulff, K., Winnebeck, E., Vetter, C., & Roenneberg, T. (2013). Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in social jetlag and mental illness. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, 119, 325346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, J. A., & Östberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97110.Google ScholarPubMed
Lau, E. Y. Y., Wong, M. L., Ng, E. C. W., Hui, C. C. H., Cheung, S. F., & Mok, D. S. Y. (2013). “Social jetlag” in morning-type college students living on campus: Implications for physical and psychological well-being. Chronobiology International, 30, 910918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemoine, P., Zawieja, P., & Ohayon, M. M. (2013). Associations between morningness/eveningness and psychopathology: An epidemiological survey in three in-patient psychiatric clinics. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 10951098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levandovski, R., Dantas, G., Fernandes, L. C., Caumo, W., Torres, I., Roenneberg, T., & Allebrandt, K. V. (2011). Depression scores associate with chronotype and social jetlag in a rural population. Chronobiology International, 28, 771778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milad, M. R., & Quirk, G. J. (2012). Fear extinction as a model for translational neuroscience: Ten years of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 129151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muro, A., Gomà-i-Freixanet, M., & Adan, A. (2009). Morningness–eveningness, sex, and the alternative five factor model of personality. Chronobiology International, 26, 12351248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pace-Schott, E. F., Germain, A., & Milad, M. R. (2015). Effects of sleep on memory for conditioned fear and fear extinction. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pace-Schott, E. F., Rubin, Z. S., Tracy, L. E., Spencer, R. M., Orr, S. P., & Verga, P. W. (2015). Emotional trait and memory associates of sleep timing and quality. Psychiatry Research, 229, 9991010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pace-Schott, E. F., Spencer, R. M., Vijayakumar, S., Ahmed, N. A., Verga, P. W., Orr, S. P., & Milad, M. R. (2013). Extinction of conditioned fear is better learned and recalled in the morning than in the evening. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 17761784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., & Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: Misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiology international, 23, 497509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Association between social jetlag (determined by subtracting weekday from weekend mean actigraphy-measured sleep midpoint expressed as minutes past midnight) and extinction memory determined by (a) Extinction Retention Index (ERI) and (b) differential ERI (dERI; corrects for general increases in reactivity) (see Supplementary Materials for ERI/dERI calculations). Note better memory for extinction is expressed as greater ERI or dERI.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Sleep timing on weekdays and weekends for evening types (ET) and intermediate-morning/morning types (IMT). Social jetlag (i.e. later sleep midpoint on weekends compared to weekdays) was greater in those with greater tendency toward morningness based on Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ; Horne and Ostberg, 1976) scores. Here, ET reflects averages across true evening types while IMT reflects averages across the upper half (higher MEQ scores, based on a median split) of intermediate types (Pace-Schott et al., 2015). This split included 2 moderate morning types and 1 definite morning type based on Horne and Ostberg (1976) scoring criteria. Note. MWD = average sleep midpoint on weekday nights; MWE = average sleep midpoint on weekend nights; TST = total sleep time.

Supplementary material: File

Bottary et al. supplementary material

Bottary et al. supplementary material

Download Bottary et al. supplementary material(File)
File 28.2 KB
Reviewing editor:  Jessica Payne University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States, 46556
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: In this manuscript, the authors examined whether social jet lag was associated with poorer extinction memory and/or evening chronotype in a sample of healthy male college students. This is a novel and interesting question, with relevance to understanding oft-noted associations between eveningness and worse psychological health. Although college students are arguably not the ideal sample for examining social jet lag as traditionally defined (see below), the manuscript could still provide a worthwhile contribution to the literature. I suggest considering the following comments/concerns:

  1. 1) More detail about weekday and weekend actigraphy data would be useful, including providing the # of weekend days available (with 9 days of data, some individuals may have 2 sets of weekend data), what weekend data was included in the means if more than one weekend was available, and the separate mean sleep timing data for both weekdays and weekends.

  2. 2) Relatedly, college students are less bound to the traditional weekday/weekend schedules (e.g., Thursday is often treated as a weekend night in terms of social activities and sleep schedule), and also have less systematically imposed early start times on weekdays (due to relatively greater control over their class schedules), raising questions about the meaningfulness of the traditional “social jet lag” definition. This may be relevant to the unexpected finding that morning chronotypes exhibited greater social jet lag in this sample (although the authors’ speculation that college schedules may be more difficult for morning-types is worth consideration as well).

  3. 3) Notably, the authors’ seemingly ignore that social jet lag in the opposite direction (advancing on the weekend) is seemingly associated with improved extinction memory. Other social jet lag papers have also ignored this issue, but it deserves discussion. Why would relative delay on weekdays be less problematic than relative delay on the weekend? In the more typical cases where eveningness and social jet lag are associated, one could argue that a delayed state is more adaptive, and thus spending relatively less time in the advanced state on weekends is a good thing. But that explanation would not seem to fit the current circumstances, when morningness was associated with greater social jet lag.

  4. 4) The authors could do more to address the lack of association between chronotype (as measured by MEQ) and extinction memory, especially given that social jet lag (which did correlate with extinction memory) was associated with morningness, which should be associated with better extinction memory based on consistent findings that eveningness is often accompanied by psychological/physical dysfunction. I wondered if it would be worth looking at whether the chronotype-extinction memory association is moderated by social jet lag—that is, in the morning-types with the most social jet lag, is there also worse extinction memory?

  5. 5) Finally, the authors could better distinguish between the standard SCR and differential SCR measures—they have the room in the Supplemental section, and it’s currently unclear how the literature views these two different approaches (whether one is more valid in certain circumstances, etc.).

Presentation

Overall score 3.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.4 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
3 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5

Review 2: Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: The authors present data showing that social jetlag in college students is positivelty associated with greater morningness and is negatively associated with fear extinction memory. The paper is well written with appropriate analyses. The results highlight the negative consequences of social jetlag on a specific domain of cognitive functioning. The authors should clarify whether the result reported on lines 90-91 (“SJ was positively associated with Recall CS+E reactivity (i.e. lower ERI/dERI)…”) is referring back to the result reported in the Figure, or is a separate analysis. If it is a separate analysis, results of the statistical test should be reported.

Presentation

Overall score 5 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5