Objective — To consider research conducted in the sub-field of mental health geography, concentrating on work published in English.Methods — The paper offers an comprehensive, in-depth and critical reading of the relevant literature on mental health geography since the inception of this subfield of inquiry in the early- 1970s.Results — The paper identifies three ‘waves’ of research within work on mental health geography. It describes these ‘waves’ in detail, interprets certain strengths and weaknesses of the first two ‘waves’, which are well-established, and provides suggestions about important questions to be addressed in a future third ‘wave’. Conclusion — Much excellent research has so far been undertaken within mental health geography, but there is scope to increase the relevance of this research through widening the focus of research and by being prepared to connect research more directly to mental health policy and politics.

— During the last three decades, we have witnessed dramatic improvements in both the psychosocial and pharmacological treatments of affective disorders. Administered in concert with the new medications advances in pharmacology have produced, disorder-specific psychosocial treatments have further improved the prognosis and course of bipolar and unipolar disorder. Methods — We review our research on unipolar and bipolar disorder and their treatment, in particular interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and modifications thereof. Results — We provide empirical evidence that IPT is an efficacious acute and maintenance treatment for affective disorders. Our cumulative research and clinical experience suggest that interpersonal relations and circadian and social rhythms influence affective illnesses and that psychotherapy may aid in normalizing problems in these areas for patients with affective illnesses. Conclusions — Despite the excitement generated by the recent progress in research on mental disorders and their treatment, we are yet to fulfill the promise that the explosion of knowledge about targeted pharmacotherapies or psychotherapies would seem to offer. To move our field forward, we must continue to apply scientific rigor and thought to understanding the suitability of current nomenclatures, the impact of comorbid psychiatric and medical illnesses and symptoms on the manifestation and treatment of affective disorders, and the practicality of widespread utilization of new treatments.

Objective – To present an overview on current progress and future directions in psychiatric genetics. Methods — The review of studies that have demonstrated a genetic contribution to a wide range of psychopathology using family, twin, adoption studies and exploration of the methods and limitations of molecular genetic studies. Results – Single gene disorders has been the area that is most straightforward with striking advances in disorders such as Huntington Disease and early onset familial Alzheimer disease. Complex phenotypes such as schizophrenia and affective disorder have presented greater difficulties but late onset Alzheimer disease and dyslexia are examples where replicated molecular genetic findings suggest that gene identification is feasible even for multifactorial disorders. Conclusion – The combination of increasingly complete information on the genome together with accessibility to this on the internet provide the essential tools for the search for susceptibility genes. Another essential requirement in trying to identify genes of small effect is well characterized large scale collections of cases and this demands the interaction of epidemiological and clinical researchers. Advances in genomics will also allow tailoring of Pharmaceuticals pointing at treatment response and side effects. Hopefully all this perspectives together, will improve our understanding of the neurobiological pathogenesis of diseases such as Schizophrenia, Depression and Bipolar disorder ‘legitimizing’ them in the public view.

Objective – The ‘PROGRES’ (PROGetto RESidenze' Residential Project) project has 3 aims: 1. To survey all Italian psychiatric Non-Hospital Residential Facilities (NHRF) (Phase 1); 2. To assess in detail 20% of the NHRFs and the patients living there (Phase 2); and 3. To carry on training programmes for the mental health workers of these facilities (Phase 3). We report here the results of Phase 1. Methods: – All NHRFs were surveyed using a structured interview administered to the manager of the facility. In some cases, this information was supplemented with data gathered from other mental health workers at the NHRFs. Results – On May 31, 2000, there were in Italy 1,370 NHRFs with 17,138 beds, giving an average number of beds per facility of 12.5 and a rate of 2.98 beds per 10,000 inhabitants. This rate varies greatly between regions, with a ratio of 1:10 between the two regions with the lowest and the highest bed rates. Seventy-three percent of the NHRFs have a 24-hour staff coverage; more than 50% are directly managed by the NHS Departments of Mental Health and more than three-quarters of the NHRFs are directly funded by the NHS. In the course of 1999 38% of the NHRFs discharged no patients, and another 32% discharged fewer than 3 patients. In about half of the NHRFs the most common patient age group was 40-59 years. In the Italian NHRFs there are 11,240 full-time mental health workers, plus several thousand half-time staff. The average number of full-time mental health workers in each NHRF is 8.2. In 58% of the NHRFs the operational chief is a psychiatrist; some 40% of the overall number of mental health workers in the NHRFs have no specific psychiatric training. The total number of patients resident in the NHRFs is 15,943; among them, 58% have never been admitted to a mental hospital, 40% have been admitted and a small percentage (1.6%) has been previously admitted to a forensic mental hospital. The availability of NHRF beds is negatively associated with the availability of non-hospital facilities (e.g., community mental health centres, day-centres) and positively associated with the number of beds in private psychiatric facilities in each region. Discussion – The current rate of NHRF beds is higher than the officially recommended national standard (2/10,000 inhabitants). However, there is a great variability between regions, which is related to the overall provision of different types of psychiatric facilities. Most NHRFs provide intensive care, and the continuum of residential facilities with different types of care, support, degree of autonomy, etc. recommended by several authors for the long-term treatment of severe patients with different disabilities, seem to be lacking. NHRFs have a very low patient turnover rate, and this may create problems in the future. Conclusions – The PROGRES project is the first national study ever carried out in Italy to evaluate a specific type of psychiatric facilities in the context of the new system of psychiatric care. When all the data will be available, it will be possible to assess in detail for the first time a national representative sample of severe, long-stay patients and the care they are receiving; on this basis, it will also be possible to recommend evidence-based policies aimed at improving the care of the severely mentally ill.

Aim — The aim of this paper is to present the results of a citation analysis concerned with the impact on the international literature of Italian researchers in psychiaty and psychology and of sub-fields, within these two disciplines, in 1995-1999 compared to 1985-1989. Method — We used a database prepared by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) that included all papers, with at least one Italian author, working in Italy, which appeared in two periods (1995-1999 and 1985-1989) in psychiatric or psychological journals listed in Current Contents. A citation analysis concerning the following years, up to 1999, was performed. Results — In 1995-1999 the most cited researchers were those involved in clinical psychology, psychiatry and psychopharmacology research. Neuropsychology, which dominated the period 1985-1989, underwent a clearcut decline. Conclusions — Citation analysis, concerning relatively short periods of time (five years), appears to be a very helpful tool for monitoring the development of scientific research in specific disciplines and the trend of the scientific production of researchers.