Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T23:48:52.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong group-level traits and selection-transmission thickets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Jeffrey C. Schank
Jeffrey C. Schank*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. [email protected]://www.agent-based-models.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I suggest that we should distinguish between weak and strong group-level traits. It is the latter that are especially problematic for developing models of cultural evolution. Using Campbell's notion of vicarious selection mechanisms, I argue that these mechanisms become intertwined with other group-level traits resulting in selection-transmission thickets that are obstacles to modeling cultural evolution.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 272 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Campbell, D. T. (1956a) Adaptive behavior from random response. Behavioral Science 1:105–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1956b) Perception as substitute trial and error. Psychological Review 63:330–42.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960) Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67:380–400.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1974b) Evolutionary epistemology. In: The philosophy of Karl R. Popper, ed. Schilpp, P. A., pp. 412–63. Open Court.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1974c) Unjustified variation and selective retention in scientific discovery. In: Studies in the philosophy of biology, ed. Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T., pp. 139–61. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975) On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist 30:1103–26.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998) Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? The Journal of Creative Behavior 32:159–76.Google Scholar
Wagenhals, L. W. & Alexander, H. L. (2001) Modeling effects-based operations in support of war games. In: Enabling technology for simulation science, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 4367. ed. Sisti, V. A. F. & Trevisani, D. A., pp. 365–76. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1997) Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science 64(4):S372–84.Google Scholar