Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:59:23.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Green beards and signaling: Why morality is not indispensable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2018

Toby Handfield Open the ORCID record for Toby Handfield [Opens in a new window] ,
John Thrasher Open the ORCID record for John Thrasher [Opens in a new window]  and
Julian García Open the ORCID record for Julian García [Opens in a new window]
Toby Handfield
Affiliation:
School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies (SoPHIS), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia. [email protected]@gmail.comwww.tobyhandfield.comwww.JohnJThrasher.com
John Thrasher
Affiliation:
School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies (SoPHIS), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia. [email protected]@gmail.comwww.tobyhandfield.comwww.JohnJThrasher.com
Julian García
Affiliation:
Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia. [email protected]://garciajulian.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that although objectivist moral attitudes may facilitate cooperation, they are not necessary for the high levels of cooperation in humans. This is implied by evolutionary models that articulate a mechanism underlying Stanford's account, and is also suggested by the ability of merely conventional social norms to explain extreme human behaviors.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, E. (2012) The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans: The case for accent. Current Anthropology 53(5):588–616. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/667654.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & West, S. A. (2010) Greenbeards. Evolution 64(1):25–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00842.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H., Smith, E. & Bowles, S. (2001) Costly signaling and cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 213(1):103–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406.Google Scholar
Haley, K. J. & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005) Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 26(3):245–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002.Google Scholar
Haney, C., Banks, C. & Zimbardo, P. (1972) Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1:69–97.Google Scholar
Jansen, V. A. A. & van Baalen, M. (2006) Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Nature 440(7084):663–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04387.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P. & Rand, D. G. (2016) Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature 530(7591):473–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16981.Google Scholar
Ohtsubo, Y. & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(2):114–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.09.004.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind and Language 27(5):495–518. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12000.Google Scholar
Traulsen, A. & Nowak, M. A. (2007) Chromodynamics of cooperation in finite populations. PLoS ONE 2(3):e270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000270.Google Scholar