Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:08:48.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autonomy in ants and humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Jeremy I. M. Carpendale  and
Michael Frayn
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. [email protected]@sfu.cahttp://www.sfu.ca/psychology/about/faculty/carpendale.html
Michael Frayn
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. [email protected]@sfu.cahttp://www.sfu.ca/psychology/about/faculty/carpendale.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing lessons regarding the consequences of ultrasociality in ants and humans depends crucially on recognizing differences as well as similarities in the way that species are social. We focus on Gowdy & Krall's use of the concept of autonomy to explicate essential differences in the ways in which ants and humans are social.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canfield, J. V. (1995) The rudiments of language. Language and Communication 15(3):195–211.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. (2009) Piaget's theory of moral development. In: The Cambridge companion to Piaget, ed. Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M & Smith, L., pp. 270–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., Atwood, S. & Kettner, V. (2013a) Meaning and mind from the perspective of dualist versus relational worldviews: Implications for the development of pointing gestures. Human Development 56:381–400.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., Hammond, S. I. & Atwood, S. (2013b) A relational developmental systems approach to moral development. In: Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system, ed. Lerner, R. M. & Benson, J. B., pp. 105–33. [Series: Advances in Child Development and Behavior, vol. 45.] Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Lewis, C. (2015) The development of social understanding. In: Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, vol. 2: Cognitive processes, 7th edition, ed. Liben, L. & Müller, U., pp. 381–424. [Editor-in-chief: R. Lerner.] Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M. (2010) Ant encounters: Interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932/1965) The moral judgment of the child. The Free Press. (Original work published in 1932).Google Scholar