Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:38:16.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A single self-deceived or several subselves divided?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Douglas T. Kenrick  and
Andrew E. White
Douglas T. Kenrick
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85282. [email protected]@asu.eduhttp://douglaskenrick.faculty.asu.edu/?q=node/10
Andrew E. White
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85282. [email protected]@asu.eduhttp://douglaskenrick.faculty.asu.edu/?q=node/10
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Would we lie to ourselves? We don't need to. Rather than a single self equipped with a few bivariate processes, the mind is composed of a dissociated aggregation of subselves processing qualitatively different information relevant to different adaptive problems. Each subself selectively processes the information coming in to the brain as well as information previously stored in the brain.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 29 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, J. M., Becker, D. V., Mortensen, C. R., Sasaki, T., Neuberg, S. L. & Kenrick, D. T. (2009) A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., Maner, J. K. & Schaller, M. (2006) They all look the same to me (unless they are angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 17:836–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B. & Kenrick, D. T. (2006) Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:63–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V., Schaller, M. (2010) Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19:63–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J. & Neuberg, S. L. (2003) Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6:1107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., Delton, A. W., Butner, J. & Schaller, M. (2005) Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:63–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (1980) Subselves. In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, ed. Wheeler, L., pp. 193–218. Sage.Google Scholar
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J., Vohs, K. & Beal, D. J. (in press) Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorsten Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar