Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:00:35.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “now moment” is believed privileged because “now” is when happening is experienced

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Ben Kenward  and
Michael Pilling
Ben Kenward
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, United Kingdom. [email protected]@brookes.ac.ukwww.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?uid=p0078109 www.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?uid=p0075139
Michael Pilling
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, United Kingdom. [email protected]@brookes.ac.ukwww.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?uid=p0078109 www.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?uid=p0075139
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hoerl & McCormack risk misleading people about the cognitive underpinnings of the belief in a privileged “now moment” because they do not explicitly acknowledge that the sense of existing in the now moment is an intrinsically temporally dynamic one. The sense of happening that is exclusive to the now moment is a better candidate for the source of belief in a privileged now.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e259
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gibson, J. J. (2014) The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, R. P. & Block, R. A. (2013) The flow of time as a perceptual illusion. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 34(1):91–100.Google Scholar
Gruber, R. P., Smith, R. P. & Block, R. A. (2018) The illusory flow and passage of time within consciousness: A multidisciplinary analysis. Timing & Time Perception 6(2):125–53. doi:10.1163/22134468-2018e001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montemayor, C. & Wittmann, M. (2014) The varieties of presence: Hierarchical levels of temporal integration. Timing & Time Perception 2(3):325–38. doi:10.1163/22134468-00002030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, T. & Nobre, A. C. (2014) Perceiving the passage of time: neural possibilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326(1):60–71. doi:10.1111/nyas.12545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G. & Cisek, P. (2016) Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(6):414–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeppel, D. (2003) The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as “asymmetric sampling in time.” Speech Communication 41(1):245–55. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, S. (2012) Why does time seem to pass? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85(1):92–116. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00445.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, B. J. & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(8):299–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. (2007a) The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(3):299–313. doi:10.1017/s0140525X07001975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanRullen, R., Zoefel, B. & Ilhan, B. (2014) On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1641):20130214. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittmann, M. (2011) Moments in time. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 5:66. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed