Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:31:14.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rawls and the Forgotten Figure of the Most Advantaged: In Defense of Reasonable Envy toward the Superrich

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2013

JEFFREY EDWARD GREEN
JEFFREY EDWARD GREEN*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
Jeffrey Edward Green is the Janice and Julian Bers Assistant Professor in the Social Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. 208 S. 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to correct the widespread imbalance in contemporary liberal thought, which makes explicit appeal to the “least advantaged” without parallel attention to the “most advantaged” as a distinct group in need of regulatory attention. Rawls's influential theory of justice is perhaps the paradigmatic instance of this imbalance, but I show how a Rawlsian framework nonetheless provides three justifications for why implementers of liberal justice—above all, legislators—should regulate the economic prospects of a polity's richest citizens: as a heuristic device for ensuring that a system of inequalities not reach a level at which inequalities cease being mutually advantageous, as protection against excessive inequalities threatening civic liberty, and as redress for a liberal society's inability to fully realize fair equality of opportunity with regard to education and politics. Against the objection that such arguments amount to a defense of envy, insofar as they support policies that in certain instances impose economic costs on the most advantaged with negative or neutral economic impact on the rest of society, I attend to Rawls's often overlooked distinction between irrational and reasonable forms of envy, showing that any envy involved in the proposed regulation of the most advantaged falls within this latter category.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 123 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce, and Alstott, Anne. 2000. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1932. Politics. Ed. and trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. 2000. “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism.” Ethics 110: 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, and Rueda, David. 2007. “Social Democracy Constrained.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 619–41.Google Scholar
Blom, Raimo, Melin, Harri, and Tanskanen, Eero. 2009. “Social Inequality IV: Finnish Data.” ISSP 2009. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD2514/ (accessed October 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert, and Groves, Melissa Osborne. 2005. Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 1995. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010a. The Arc of the Moral Universe. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010b. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. 1982, “Equality and Envy.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 16: 35–47.Google Scholar
Duff, David. 2005. “Abolition of Wealth Transfer Taxes.” Pittsburgh Tax Review 3 (72): 71–120.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Is Democracy Possible Here? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edlund, Jonas, and Svallfors, Stefan. 2009. “Social Inequality IV: Swedish Data.” ISSP 2009. http://snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/study/577 (accessed October 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Epstein, Joseph. 2003. Envy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández de la Mora, Gonzalo, and De Nicolas, Antonio. 1987. Egalitarian Envy: The Political Foundations of Social Justice. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steve, and Gerstle, Gary, eds. 2005. Ruling America: A History of Wealth and Power in a Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007a. Justice and the Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007b. Rawls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1949. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Strachey, Trans. J.. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 778–96.Google Scholar
Graetz, Michael, and Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrington, James. 1977. The Political Works of James Harrington. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1986. What's Fair? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Knows and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1984. Writings. Ed. Petersen, Merill D.. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2003. The Great Unraveling: Losing Our Way in the New Century. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1986. “Market Justice, Political Justice.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 383–402.Google Scholar
Lehning, Percy B. 2009. John Rawls: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Distribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 316–36.Google Scholar
Maffettone, Sebastian. 2011. Rawls: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Mandle, Jon. 2009. Rawls's “A Theory of Justice”: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Bill, and Wajcman, Judy, 2004. “Understanding Class Inequality in Australia.” In Social Inequalities in Comparative Perspective, eds. Devine, Fiona and Waters, Mary. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 163–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Leslie, and Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. “Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 459–84.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 2006. “Contain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 147–63.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. 1998. On Liberty and Other Essays. Ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de. 1979. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. and trans. Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia, and Stone, Harold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. 1965. Utopia in The Complete Works of St. Thomas More, vol. IV. Eds. Surtz, Edward and Hexter, J. H.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard. 2002. “Equality, Envy, and the Sense of Justice.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1): 43–53.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2009. Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Kevin. 2002. Wealth and Democracy. New York: Broadway.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1989. The Collected Dialogues, ed. Hamilton, E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2007 John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1958. “Justice as Fairness.” In CP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1963a. “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1963b. “The Sense of Justice.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1967. “Distributive Justice.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1968. “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1969. “The Justification of Civil Disobedience.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971a. A Theory of Justice [T]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971b. “Justice as Reciprocity.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1975. “A Kantian Conception of Equality.” In CP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. Collected Papers [CP]. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b Theory of Justice: Revised Edition [rev]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement [R]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition [PL]. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, Edeltraud, and Rudi, Tatjana. 2008. “Explaining Level and Equality of Political Participation: The Role of Social Capital, Socioeconomic Modernity, and Political Institutions.” In Social Capital in Europe: Similarity of Countries and Diversity of People?, ed. Meulemann, Heiner. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 251–83.Google Scholar
Sacks, Peter. 2007. Tearing Down the Gates: Confronting the Class Divide in American Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (1): 5–39.Google Scholar
Scherer, Matthew. 2006. “Saint John: The Miracle of Secular Reason.” In Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-secular World, eds. de Vries, Hent and Lawrence, E. Sullivan. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2012. “Democracy, War and Wealth: Lessons from Two Centuries of Inheritance Taxation.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 81–102.Google Scholar
Schoeck, Helmut. 1969. Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Skopek, Nora, Bucholz, Sandra, and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter. 2011. “Wealth Inequality in Europe and the Delusive Egalitarianism of Scandinavian Countries.” Bamberg University. Working paper. http://www.soziologie-blossfeld.de/Skopek-Nora.165.0.html (accessed October 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R., and Kluegel, James. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality. New York: A. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert S. 2011. Reconstructing Rawls. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry. 2003. “Egalitarianism Defended.” Ethics 113 (July): 764–82.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Patrick. 2008. “Envy, Facts and Justice: A Critique of the Treatment of Envy in Justice as Fairness.” Res Publica 14: 101–16.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principles.” In Cambridge Companion to John Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–40.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Voice, Paul. 2011. Rawls Explained: From Fairness to Utopia. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey, and Page, Benjamin. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7: 731–51.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Chris. 2008. The Difference Principle beyond Rawls. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Young, Robert. 1989. “Egalitarianism and Envy.” Philosophical Studies 52: 261–76.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.