Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:57:05.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of giving autistic testimony a substantial role in the science of autism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Janette Dinishak*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. [email protected]://philosophy.ucsc.edu/faculty/index.php?uid=jdinisha

Abstract

Jaswal & Akhtar argue that taking seriously autistic testimony will help make the science of autism more humane, accurate, and useful. In this commentary, I pose two questions about autistic testimony's role(s) in a better science of autism and extract a general lesson about the value of autistic testimony from the authors’ arguments.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dinishak, J. (2016) The deficit view and its critics. Disability Studies Quarterly 36(4). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v36i4.5236.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grasswick, H. (2017) Epistemic injustice in science. In: The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice, ed. Kidd, I. J., Medina, J. & Pohlhaus, G. Jr., pp. 313–23. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hadjikhani, N., Johnels, J. A., Zürcher, N. R., Lassalle, A., Guillon, Q., Hippolyte, L., Billstedt, E., Ward, N., Lemonnier, E. & Gillberg, C. (2017) Look me in the eyes: constraining gaze in the eye-region provokes abnormally high subcortical activation in autism. Scientific Reports 7: Article 3163. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03378-5.Google Scholar