Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:18:15.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two faces of social-psychological realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Nicholas Hoover Wilson  and
Julie Y. Huang
Nicholas Hoover Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4356. [email protected]://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/sociology/people/faculty/wilson.html
Julie Y. Huang
Affiliation:
College of Business, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3775. [email protected]://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/business/faculty_pages/fulltime/Julie%20Huang.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary places Jussim (2012) in dialogue with sociological perspectives on social reality and the political-academic nature of scientific paradigms. Specifically, we highlight how institutions, observers, and what is being observed intersect, and discuss the implications of this intersection on measurement within the social world. We then identify similarities between Jussim's specific narrative regarding social perception research, with noted patterns of scientific change.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e17
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, H. (1966) The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1999) The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frickel, S. & Gross, N. (2005) A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review 70:204–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48:781–95.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (2004) Historical ontology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (2015) The performativity of networks. European Journal of Sociology 56:175–205.Google Scholar
Jussim, L. (2012) Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1962).Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1999) The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaTour, B. (1999) Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2008) A engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets (inside technology). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1996) On social structure and science. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pager, D. (2003) The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology 108:937–75.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1991) Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Penner, A. M. & Saperstein, A. (2008) How social status shapes race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:19628–30.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1988) The many faces of realism. Open Court.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922/1946) Science as vocation. In: From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, ed. Gerth, H. H. & Wright Mills, C.. Free Press. (Original work published in 1922).Google Scholar