Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T21:36:10.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polygenic scores and social science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Walter Veit Open the ORCID record for Walter Veit [Opens in a new window]  and
Heather Browning Open the ORCID record for Heather Browning [Opens in a new window]
Walter Veit
Affiliation:
School of History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia [email protected]; https://walterveit.com/
Heather Browning
Affiliation:
Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK [email protected]; https://www.heatherbrowning.net/ Department of Philosophy, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Southampton, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a hotly contested issue whether polygenic scores should play a major role in the social sciences. Here, we defend a methodologically pluralist stance in which sociogenomics should abandon its hype and recognize that it suffers from all the methodological difficulties of the social sciences, yet nevertheless maintain an optimistic stance toward a more cautious use.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e229
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harden, K. P. (2021). The genetic lottery: Why DNA matters for social equality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, W. (2019). Model pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(2), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, W. (2021). Model diversity and the embarrassment of riches. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(3), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylikoski, P., & Aydinonat, N. E. (2014). Understanding with theoretical models. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar