No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Vertical pleiotropy explains the heritability of social science traits
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2023
Abstract
We contend that social science variables are the product of multiple partly heritable traits. Genetic associations with socioeconomic status (SES) may differ across populations, but this is a consequence of the intermediary traits associated with SES differences also varying. Furthermore, genetic data allow social scientists to make causal statements regarding the aetiology and consequences of SES.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
*
Both authors contributed equally.
References
Anderson, E. L., Howe, L. D., Wade, K. H., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Hill, W. D., Deary, I. J., … Hemani, G. (2020). Education, intelligence and Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(4), 1163–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, N. M., Hill, W. D., Anderson, E. L., Sanderson, E., Deary, I. J., & Davey Smith, G. (2019). Multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization estimates of the effects of intelligence and education on health. eLife, 8, e43990. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43990CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. D., Davies, G., Liewald, D. C., McIntosh, A. M., & Deary, I. J. (2016). Age-dependent pleiotropy between general cognitive function and major psychiatric disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 80(4), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. D., Davies, N. M., Ritchie, S. J., Skene, N. G., Bryois, J., Bell, S., … Deary, I. J. (2019a). Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income. Nature Communications, 10, 5741. doi: 10.1101/573691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. D., Marioni, R. E., Maghzian, O., Ritchie, S. J., Hagenaars, S. P., McIntosh, A. M., … Deary, I. J. (2019b). A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(2), 169–181. doi: 10.1038/s41380-017-0001-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. D., Weiss, A., Liewald, D. C., Davies, G., Porteous, D. J., Hayward, C., … Deary, I. J. (2020). Genetic contributions to two special factors of neuroticism are associated with affluence, higher intelligence, better health, and longer life. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(11), 3034–3052. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0387-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, L. J., Nivard, M. G., Morris, T. T., Hansen, A. F., Rasheed, H., Cho, Y., … Within Family, C. (2022). Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects. Nature Genetics, 54(5), 581–592. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jencks, C., Smith, M., Henry, A., Jo Bane, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., … Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J.-B., … Plomin, R. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 15273–15278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408777111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, E., Trzaskowski, M., Coleman, J. R. I., Selzam, S., Dale, P. S., … Plomin, R. (2018). Genetic influence on social outcomes during and after the Soviet era in Estonia. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 269–275. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0332-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, E., Davey Smith, G., Bowden, J., & Munafò, M. R. (2019). Mendelian randomisation analysis of the effect of educational attainment and cognitive ability on smoking behaviour. Nature Communications, 10, 2949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10679-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tropf, F. C., Lee, S. H., Verweij, R. M., Stulp, G., van der Most, P. J., de Vlaming, R., … Mills, M. C. (2017). Hidden heritability due to heterogeneity across seven populations. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 757–765. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0195-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology
Related commentaries (24)
Beware of the phony horserace between genes and environments
Burt uses a fallacious motte-and-bailey argument to dispute the value of genetics for social science
Cognitive traits are more appropriate for genetic analysis than social outcomes
Complex interactions confound any unitary approach to social phenomena, not just biological ones
Don't miss the chance to reap the fruits of recent advances in behavioral genetics
Downward causation and vertical pleiotropy
Genomics might not be the solution, but epistemic validity remains a challenge in the social sciences
GWASs and polygenic scores inherit all the old problems of heritability estimates
Increasing the use of functional and multimodal genetic data in social science research
Methodological question-begging about the causes of complex social traits
Misguided model of human behavior: Comment on C. H. Burt: “Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science…”
Often wrong, sometimes useful: Including polygenic scores in social science research
Polygenic risk scores cannot make their mark on psychiatry without considering epigenetics
Polygenic scores and social science
Polygenic scores ignore development and epigenetics, dramatically reducing their value
Polygenic scores, and the genome-wide association studies they derive from, will have difficulty identifying genes that predispose one to develop a social behavioral trait
Social scientists would do well to steer clear of polygenic scores
Taking a lifespan approach to polygenic scores
The challenges of sociogenomics make it more, not less, worthy of careful and innovative investigation
The failure of gene-centrism
The social stratification of population as a mechanism of downward causation
The value of sociogenomics in understanding genetic evolution in contemporary human populations
Tractable limitations of current polygenic scores do not excuse genetically confounded social science
Vertical pleiotropy explains the heritability of social science traits
Author response
Polygenic scores for social science: Clarification, consensus, and controversy