Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:05:52.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the predictive brain gets it really wrong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

Gavin Buckingham  and
Melvyn A. Goodale
Gavin Buckingham
Affiliation:
The Brain and Mind Institute, Natural Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada. [email protected]://publish.uwo.ca/~gbucking/[email protected]://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/goodale/
Melvyn A. Goodale
Affiliation:
The Brain and Mind Institute, Natural Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada. [email protected]://publish.uwo.ca/~gbucking/[email protected]://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/goodale/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clark examines the notion of the “predictive brain” as a unifying model for cognitive neuroscience, from the level of basic neural processes to sensorimotor control. Although we are in general agreement with this notion, we feel that there are many details that still need to be fleshed out from the standpoint of perception and action.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 208 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh, L. A., Kao, M., Johansson, R. S. & Flanagan, J. R. (2012) Material evidence: Interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. Journal of Neurophysiology 108(5):1262–69. doi:10.1152/jn.00263.2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brayanov, J. B. & Smith, M. A. (2010) Bayesian and “anti-Bayesian” biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size–weight illusion. Journal of Neurophysiology 103(3):1518–31.Google Scholar
Buckingham, G. & Goodale, M. A. (2010) Lifting without seeing: The role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion. PLoS ONE 5(3):e9709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009709.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. R. & Beltzner, M. A. (2000) Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nature Neuroscience 3(7):737–41. doi:10.1038/76701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, J. R., Bittner, J. P. & Johansson, R. S. (2008) Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Current Biology: CB 18(22):1742–47. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geisler, W. S. & Kersten, D. (2002) Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience 5(6):508–10. doi:10.1038/nn0602-508.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. (1998) Brainy mind. British Medical Journal 317(7174):1693–95.Google Scholar
Körding, K. P. & Wolpert, D. M. (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427(6971):244–47. doi:10.1038/nature02169.Google Scholar
Murray, D. J., Ellis, R. R., Bandomir, C. A. & Ross, H. E. (1999) Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Perception and Psychophysics 61(8):1681–85.Google Scholar
Ross, H. E. (1969) When is a weight not illusory? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 21(4):346–55. doi:10.1080/14640746908400230.Google Scholar
Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P. & Adelson, E. H. (2002) Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 5(6):598–604. doi:10.1038/nn858.Google Scholar