Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:47:57.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping collective emotions to make sense of collective behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

Maxime Taquet ,
Jordi Quoidbach ,
Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye  and
Martin Desseilles
Maxime Taquet
Affiliation:
ICTEAM Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. [email protected]://maximetaquet.com/
Jordi Quoidbach
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Business, University Pompeu Fabra, 08005 Barcelona, Spain. [email protected]://www.quoidbach.org/
Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA [email protected]://www.demontjoye.com/
Martin Desseilles
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Namur Medical School, B-5000 Namur, Belgium. [email protected]://mentalhealthsciences.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While Bentley et al.’s model is very appealing, in this commentary we argue that researchers interested in big data and collective behavior, including the way humans make decisions, must account for the emotional factor. We investigate how daily choice of activities is influenced by emotions. Results indicate that mood significantly predicts people's decisions about what to do next, stressing the importance of emotional state on decision-making.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 102 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A. & Damasio, A. R. (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior 52:336–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M. & Young, M. J. (1997) Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72(1):117–35.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:146–59.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (2000) Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review 90:426–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenhaut, S. & Van Kenhove, P. (2006) The mediating role of anticipated guilt in consumers' ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 69:269–88.Google Scholar