Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T15:23:48.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical Processes and Models of Interplanetary Responses: Suggested Theoretical Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

S. Cuperman
S. Cuperman*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three ways to improve the theory and therefore the understanding of the physical processes in the interplanetary medium (during both quiet and disturbed periods of solar activity) are suggested. They are: (1) the development and consequently the use of higher order moments (fluid) equations as well as of more realistic closure conditions and transport coefficients for the macroscopic description of the solar wind ; (2) the undertaking of computer simulation experiments on the nonlinear collective relaxation process through particle-wave-particle interaction due to the plasma electromagnetic instabilities which may develop under conditions prevailing in the solar wind; and (3) the consideration of collective interactions in the evaluation of the transport coefficients, as deduced from the quasi-linear theory and computer simulation experiments, and their incorporation into the higher order moment equations.

Type
Part VI. Coronal and Interplanetary Responses to Short Time Scale Phenomena: - Theoretical Considerations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 91: Solar and Interplanetary Dynamics , 1980 , pp. 459 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1980 

References

Abraham-Schrauner, B., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., and Feldman, W. C.: 1979, J. Geophys. Res., 84, pp. 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, A.: 1975, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 13, pp. 1049–1053.Google Scholar
Braginskii, S. I.: 1965, Reviews of Plasma Physics (New York: Consultant Bureau).Google Scholar
Brandt, J. C.: 1970, Introduction to the Solar Wind, Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Burlaga, L. F.: 1975, Space Sci. Rev., 17, pp. 327–351.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S.: 1977, in Shea, M. A. et al. (eds.), Study of Travelling Interplanetary Medium, D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 165–194.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S.: 1979, in Rosenbauer, H. (ed.): Solar Wind 4 Conference Springer-Verlag, (in press).Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., Gomberoff, L. and Sternleib, A.: 1975, J. Plasma Phys., 13, pp. 259–272.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., and Landau, R., 1974: J. Geophys. Res., 79, pp. 128–134.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., and Salu, Y.: 1972, Proc. 5th European Conf. on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Phys., pp. 140–144.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., and Sternlieb, A.: 1975, Plasma Physics, pp. 699–705.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., Sternlieb, A., and Williams, D. J.: 1977, J. Plasma Physics, 16, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., Roth, I., and Bernstein, W.: 1976, J. Plasma Physics, 15, 309–324.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., Weiss, I., and Dryer, M.: 1979, Communicated.Google Scholar
Dessler, A. J.: 1967, Rev. Geophys., 5, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Dryer, M.: 1975, Space Sci. Rev., 17, pp. 277–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M.: 1979, in Rosenbauer, (ed.) Solar Wind 4 Conference, Springer-Verlag, (in press).Google Scholar
Dryer, M. and Cuperman, S.: 1972, in McIntosh, P. S. and Dryer, M. (eds.), Solar Activity Observations and Predictions, pp. 197–229.Google Scholar
Feldman, W. C., Abraham-Shrauner, B., Asbridge, J. R., and Bame, S.J.: 1976, in Williams, D. J. (ed.), Physics of Solar Planetary Environments, Amer. Geophys. Union, Washington, D.C., pp. 413–427.Google Scholar
Feldman, W. C.: 1977, in Kennel, C. F., Lanzerotti, L. J. and Parker, E. N. (eds.), Solar System Plasma Physics, 20th Anniversary Review, North Holland, pp. 767–806.Google Scholar
Haber, I., Wagner, C. E., Boris, J. P., and Dawson, J. M.: 1970, Proc. Fourth Conf. Numer. Simulation Plasmas, p. 126.Google Scholar
Hamasaki, S., Krall, N. A., Wagner, C. E., and Byrne, R. N.: 1977, Phys. Fluids, 20, pp. 65–71.Google Scholar
Hollweg, J. V.: 1975, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 13, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
Holzer, T. E.: 1976, in Williams, D. J. (ed.), Physics of Solar Planetary Environments, American Geophys. Union, Washington, D. C., pp. 366–412.Google Scholar
Holzer, T. E., and Axford, W. I.: 1970, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 8, pp. 30–60.Google Scholar
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1972, Coronal Expansion and Solar Wind, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Kennel, C. F., and Petschek, H. E.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res., 71, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Lemons, D. S., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., Gary, S. P., and Gosling, J. T.: 1979, J. Geophys. Res., 84, pp. 2135–2138.Google Scholar
Liewer, P. C., and Krall, N. A.: 1973, Phys. Fluids, 16, pp. 1953–1963.Google Scholar
Morse, R. L., and Nielson, C. W.: 1971, Phys. Fluids, 14, pp. 830–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N.: 1958, Astrophys. J., 128, pp. 664–685.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N.: 1963, Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N.: 1969, Space Sci. Rev., 9, pp. 325–360.Google Scholar
Scarf, F. L.: 1970, Space Sci. Rev., 11, pp. 234–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, S. T.: 1979, Space Sci. Rev., 23, pp. 159–200.Google Scholar
Völk, H. J.: 1975, Space Sci. Rev., 17, pp. 255–276.Google Scholar