Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:14:12.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards consumer-driven meat supply chains: opportunities and challenges for differentiation by taste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2017

Birgit Schulze-Ehlers  and
Sven Anders
Birgit Schulze-Ehlers*
Affiliation:
Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5, 37073 Goettingen, Germany Department of Global Value Chains and Trade, Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, New Zealand
Sven Anders
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, University of Alberta, 523 General Services Building, Edmonton Alberta T6 G 2H1, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the state of pork supply as to its neglect of developing innovations and mechanisms for delivering superior eating quality to consumers. We explore reasons behind pork supply chains’ predominant focus on mass production combined with traceability and food safety, while only little attention has been given to potentially lucrative niche markets focused on intrinsic quality cues. Using established analytical frameworks of hedonic pricing and transactions costs economics we discuss alternative strategies for the segregation and promotion of intrinsic sensory differentiated pork. Growing empirical evidence in the literature underpins the importance of eating experience in delivering utility to consumers and in stabilizing declining demand trends in major markets. Building on current consumer behavioral literature and organizational developments in meat supply chains in Europe and Australia, we critically discuss opportunities to overcome this supposedly suboptimal situation.

Keywords

hedonic demand theoryincentive alignmenttransaction costsporklabeling
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 33 , Special Issue 1: Value Chain Development and Impacts , February 2018 , pp. 73 - 85
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acebrón, L.B. and Dopico, D.C. 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference 11: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, W. and Anders, S. 2010. The value of brand and convenience attributes in highly processed food products. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(1): 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., and Spiller, A. 2009. The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk oriented auditing. Food Control 20(10): 927–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 62(5): 777–795.Google Scholar
Anders, S. 2008. Imperfect competition in German food retailing: Evidence from state level. Atlantic Economic Journal 36: 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, S. and Moeser, A. 2010. Consumer choice and health: The importance of health attributes for retail meat demand in Canada. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(2): 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E.W. and Shugan, S.M. 1991. Repositioning for changing preferences: The case of beef versus poultry. Journal of Consumer Research 18(2): 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T., Benner, E., and Glitsch, K. 2000. Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: A framework for analysis. British Food Journal 102: 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beriain, M.J., Sanchez, M., and Carr, T.R. 2009. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios. Journal of Animal Science 89: 3392–3402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernués, A., Olaizola, A., and Corcoran, K. 2003. Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: An application for market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 14: 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R., Bekhit, A.E.D., Robertson, A.E.D., Roberts, N., and Geesink, G.H. 2001. Impact of introducing specifications on the tenderness of retail meat. Meat Science 59: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchard, P.J., Willis, M.B., Warkup, C.C., and Ellis, M. 2000. The influence of carcass backfat and intramuscular fat level on pork eating quality. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 80: 145–151.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, M. and Lebret, B. 2010. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork. Meat Science 84: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonneau, M., Antoine-Ilari, E., Phatsara, C., Brinkmann, D., Hviid, M., Groes Christiansen, M., Fàbrega, E., Rodríguez, P., Rydhmer, L., Enting, I., de Greef, K., Edge, H., Dourmad, J.-Y., and Edwards, S. 2011. Diversity of pork production systems at farm level in Europe. Journal on Chain and Network Science 11(2): 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredahl, L., Grunert, K.G., and Fertin, C. 1998. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 9(4): 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brester, G.W., Lhermite, P., Goodwin, B.K., and Hunt, M.C. 1993. Quantifying the effects of new product development: The case of low fat ground beef. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(2): 239–250.Google Scholar
Brewer, M.S., Zhu, L.G., and McKeith, F.K. 2001. Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: Consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics. Meat Science 59(2): 153–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunso, K., Fjord, A.T., and Grunert, K.G. 2002. Consumers’ food choice and quality perception. The Aarhus School of Business, Working Paper no 77, ISSN 0907 2101. p. 1–60.Google Scholar
Cardello, A.V., Schutz, H.G., and Lesher, L.L. 2007. Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 8: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J.A. and Anders, S. 2012. Private Versus Third Party versus Government Labeling. In Lusk, J.L., Roosen, J. and Shogren, J.F. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. p. 472–481.Google Scholar
Caswell, J.A., Noelke, C.M., and Mojduszka, E.M. 2002. Unifying two frameworks for analyzing quality and quality assurance for food products. In Krissoff, B., Bohman, M. and Caswell, J.A. (eds). Global Food Trade and Consumer Demand for Quality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY. p. 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, H. 2003. Identifying consumer willingness to pay for high quality pork. Australian Pork Research Report 1633. Available at Web site https://australianpork.infoservices.com.au/ Google Scholar
Chen, K., Ali, M., Veeman, M., Unterschultz, J., and LeRelative, T. 2002. Importance rankings for pork attributes by Asian-origin consumers in California: Applying an ordered probit model to a choice-based sample. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, M.R. and Karni, E. 1973. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16: 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, D., Euken, R., McMullen, L., Stender, D., Storlie, M., Steinhart, T., and Weiss, J. 2006. Maximizing productivity and throughput: reflections from Denmark. Presentation given on the Iowa Regional Pork Conference, February 22–24, 2006, Available at Web site http://www.ipic.iastate.edu/presentations/ISUEIPRC06.pdf Google Scholar
Donnet, M.L., Weatherspoon, D.D., and Hoehn, J.P. 2008. Price determinants in top quality e-auctioned specialty coffees. Agricultural Economics 38: 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dransfield, E., Zamora, F., and Bayle, M.-C. 1998. Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Quality and Preference 9(5): 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dransfield, E., Ngapo, T.M., Nielsen, N.A., Bredahl, L., Sjödén, P., Magnusson, O.M., Campo, M.M., and Nute, G.R. 2005. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Science 69(1): 61–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutton, J.M., Ward, C.E., and Lusk, J.L. 2007. Implicit Value of Retail Beef Brands and Retail Meat Product Attributes. Proceeding of the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting and Market Risk Management. Chicago, IL. Available at Web site http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/conf_2007/pdf/confp15-07.pdf Google Scholar
Enneking, U. 2004. Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: The case for the Q&S label. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2): 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enting, I. and Zonderland, J.J. 2006. Actions to enhance vertical coordination in the Dutch pig chain. Paper presented at 16th Annual IAMA Conference, June 10–13, 2006, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
FAO (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/610/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=610#ancorFAO.Google Scholar
Fischer, C., Hartmann, M., Reynolds, N., Leat, P., Revoredo-Giha, C., Henchion, M., Albisu, L.M., and Gracia, A. 2009. Factors influencing contractual choice and sustainable relationships in European agri-food supply chains. European Review of Agricultural Economics 36(4): 541–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P., Mellett, F.D., and Hoffman, L.C. 2000. Halothane genotype and pork quality. 1. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of three halothane genotypes. Meat Science 54: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, G., Heidi, R., Thompson, J., and Dart, J. 2009. The aggregate economic benefits to 2007/08 from the adoption of Meat Standards Australia. Australasian Agribusiness Review 17: 135–142.Google Scholar
Griffith, G.R., Thompson, J.M., Polkinghorne, R., and Gunner, R. 2010. Meat Standards Australia as an Innovation in the Australian Beef Production and Marketing System. Paper presented at the 2010 International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria, February 8–12. Available at Web site http://purl.umn.edu/100471 Google Scholar
Grunert, K.G., Larsen, H.H.T., Madsen, K., and Baadsgaard, A. 1996. Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture. Kluwer, Norwell, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, K.G., Bredahl, L., and Brunsø, K. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and Implications for product development in the meat sector—a review. Meat Science 66: 259–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, W.F. and Mathews, K.H. Jr 2007. Characteristics and hedonic pricing of differentiated beef demands. Agricultural Economics 36: 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J.E. and Young, L.M. 2000. Closer vertical co-ordination in agri-food supply chains: A conceptual framework and some preliminary evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5(3): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.L. and Lin, B.H. 2007. A hedonic analysis of fresh tomato prices among regional markets. Review of Agricultural Economics 29(4): 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorens Abando, L. and Martinez Palou, A.M. 2006. Main stages in the meat food chain in Europe. Statistics in focus–Agriculture and Fisheries 6/2006. Available at Web site http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cahce/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NN-06-006-EN.PDF.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L. and McCluskey, J.J. 2000. Assessing consumer response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness 16(3): 309–320.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueth, M. and Spiller, A. 2005. Brands as quality signals in the meat sector: a conjoint analysis. Contributed paper for the 15th Annual World Food and Agribusiness Forum of the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, June 25–28, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Martin, G.J.S., Brummer, B., and Troncoso, J.L. 2007. Determinants of Argentinean wine prices in the US Market. American Association of Wine Economists Working Paper No. 15.Google Scholar
Martinez, S.W. 1999. Vertical Coordination in the Pork and Broiler Industries: Implications for Pork and Chicken Products. Agricultural Economic Report No. 777. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
Martinez, S.W. and Zering, K. 2004. Pork Quality and the Role of Market Organization. Agricultural Economic Report No. 835. Washington, DC, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
McEachern, M.G. and Schroeder, M.J.A. 2001. The role of livestock production ethics in consumer values towards meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEachern, M.G. and Schroeder, M.J.A. 2004. Integrating the voice of the consumer within the value chain: A focus on value-based labelling communications in the fresh-meat sector. Journal of Consumer Marketing 21(7): 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, B.E., Huffman, W.E., and Shogren, J.F. 1996. Economic values of pork attributes: Hedonic price analysis of experimental auction data. Review of Agricultural Economics 18(4): 613–627.Google Scholar
MLA (2015). http://www.mla.com.au/News-and-events/Industry-news/The-rise-and-rise-of-MSA Google Scholar
Moeller, S.J., Miller, R.K., Aldredge, T.L., Logan, K.E., Edwards, K.K., Zerby, H.N., Boggess, M., Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., and Stahl, C.A. 2010. Trained sensory perception of pork eating quality as affected by fresh and cooked pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature. Meat Science 85(1): 96–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales de Queiroz, C. and Zylbersztajn, D. 2011. Failures in incentive transmission along Brazil's quality beef chain. Journal on Chain and Network Science 11(3): 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, L.E., Fleming, E., Wright, V., Griffith, G., and Umberger, W. 2008. Product and branding innovations in the Australian beef marketing system. 52nd Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, February 5–8, 2008, Canberra, Australia. Available at Web site http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare08/5993.html Google Scholar
Mulrony, B.R., and Chaddad, F.R. 2005. Strategic Alliances in the U.S. Beef Supply Chain. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(3): 18–32.Google Scholar
Nijhoff-Savvaki, R., Trienekens, J., and Omta, O. 2008. De Groene Weg: the organic pork chain in the Netherlands. In Trienekens, J., Petersen, B., Wognum, N. and Brinkmann, D. (eds). European Pork Chains. Diversity and Quality Challenges in Consumer-Oriented Production and Distribution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 157–168.Google Scholar
Papanagiotou, P., Tzimitra-Kalogiann, I., and Melfou, K. 2013. Consumers’ expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat. Meat Science 9: 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parcell, J.L. and Schroeder, T.C. 2007. Hedonic retail beef and pork product prices. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(1): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, C., de Castro, R., and Font I Furnols, M. 2009. The pork industry: A supply chain perspective. British Food Journal 111(3): 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, R., Watson, R., Porter, M., Gee, A., and Scott, J. 1999. Meat Standards Australia, a ‘PACCP’ based beef grading system for consumers. In ‘Proceedings of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology’, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, R., Watson, R., Thompson, J.M., and Pethick, D.W. 2008a. Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1459–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, R., Thompson, J.M., Watson, R., Gee, A., and Porter, M. 2008b. Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(11): 1351–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, C.S., Juhl, H.J., Kristensen, K., Bech, A.C., and Engelund, E. 1996. Quality guidance and quality formation. Food Quality and Preference 7(2): 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QS. 2010. Aktuelle Anzahl der Systempartner – Systemkette Fleisch und Fleischwaren. Available at Web site http://www.q-s.de/fileadmin/QS_Fileadmin/Mediacenter/Teilnehmerzahlen/Aktuelle_Teilnehmerzahlen%2C_1._Januar_2010.pdf Google Scholar
Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy 82(1): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saenger, C., Torero, M., and Qaim, M. 2014. Impact of third-party contract enforcement in agricultural markets—A field experiment in Vietnam. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(4): 1220–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, D.R., Moon, W., and Todd, K. 2007. Consumer willingness-to-pay for fresh pork attributes. Journal of Agribusiness 25(2): 163–179.Google Scholar
Schrader, L.F. 1998. Coordination in the US Hog/pork Industry. Staff Paper No. 98–19, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Schulz, L. and Tonsor, G. 2015. The U.S. Gestation Stall Debate. Choices 30(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Schulze, B., Wocken, C., and Spiller, A. 2006. Relationship quality in agri-food chains: Supplier management in the German pork and dairy sector. Journal on Chain and Network Science 6: 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, B., Spiller, A., and Theuvsen, L. 2007. A broader view on vertical coordination: Lessons from the German pork sector. Journal of Chain and Network Science 7(1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shongwe, M., Jooste, A., Hugo, A., Alemu, Z., and Pelser, A. 2007. Will consumers pay for less fat on beef cuts? The Case in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Agrekon 46(4): 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing 59(3): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21: 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. and van Trijp, H.C.M. 1996. Quality guidance: A consumer based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23: 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonsor, G.T. and Schroeder, T. 2013. Economic Needs Assessment: Pork Quality Grading System. Report prepared for the National Pork Board. Available at Web site http://www.agmanager.info/sites/default/files/pdf/EconomicNeedsAssessmentOfPorkQualityGradingSystem.pdf Google Scholar
Trienekens, J. and Wognum, N. 2009. Introduction to the European pork chain. In Trienekens, J., Petersen, B., Wognum, N. and Brinkmann, D. (eds). European Pork Chains. Diversity and Quality Challenges in Consumer-Oriented Production and Distribution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trienekens, J., Petersen, B., Wognum, N., and Brinkmann, D. (eds). (2009) European Pork Chains. Diversity and Quality Challenges in Consumer-Oriented Production and Distribution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Heuvel, T., van Trijp, H.C.M., van Woerkum, C., Renes, R.J., and Gremmen, B. 2007. Linking product offering to consumer needs; inclusion of credence attributes and the influences of product features. Food Quality and Preference 18: 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, W. and Viaene, J. 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference 10: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickner, S.S. 2015. Estimating the implicit price of convenience: A hedonic analysis of the US breakfast sausage market. Agribusiness 31(2): 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C.E., Lusk, J.L., and Dutton, J.M. 2008. Implicit value of retail beef product attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(3): 364–381.Google Scholar
Watson, R., Polkinghorne, R., and Thompson, J.M. 2008. Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1368–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, M., Wognum, N., Trienekens, J., and Omta, O. 2010. Alignment between chain quality management and chain governance in EU pork supply chains: A transaction-cost-economics perspective. Meat Science 84: 228–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar