Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:39:47.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fully divine and fully human: a bi-modal outline towards consistency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Jc BEALL Open the ORCID record for Jc BEALL [Opens in a new window]  and
A. J. COTNOIR
Jc BEALL*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN46556, USA
A. J. COTNOIR*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL, UK
*
e-mail: [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers and theologians have long recognized apparent contradictions in the Christian doctrine of the incarnation wherein Jesus is both fully divine and fully human and thereby exemplifies all properties essential to being divine and all properties essential to being human, including, respectively, immutability and mutability. In this article, we outline a new account of such apparent contradictions, wherein each such pair of (modal) properties involves different modal operators.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 258 - 265
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marilyn McCord (2006) Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert (1979) ‘Theories of actuality’, Noûs, 8, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, James (2007) Paradoxes in Christian Theology (Waynesboro GA: Paternoster).Google Scholar
Beall, Jc (2019) ‘Christ – a contradiction’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 400–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, Jc (2020) The Contradictory Christ (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Beall, Jc & Henderson, Jared (2019) ‘A neglected qua solution to the fundamental problem of Christology’, Faith and Philosophy, 36, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, Sarah (2002) ‘What Chalcedon solved and didn't solve’, in Davis, Stephen T. SJ, Kendall, Daniel, & O'Collins, Gerald SJ (eds) The Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. (2007) Divinity and Humanity: The Incarnation Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. (2009) God Incarnate: Explorations in Christology (New York NY: T & T Clark).Google Scholar
Cross, Richard (2011) ‘The incarnation’, in Flint, Thomas P. & Rea, Michael (eds) Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 452–475.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael (2014) ‘Christological consistency and the reduplicative qua’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 2, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael (2016) ‘Classical theism, classical anthropology, and the Christological coherence problem’, Faith and Philosophy, 33, 278–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humberstone, I. L. (1981) ‘From worlds to possibilities’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10, 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedwab, Joseph (2015) ‘Against the Geachian theory of the trinity and incarnation’, Faith and Philosophy, 32, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna & Hill, Jonathan (2010) ‘Composition models of the incarnation: unity and unifying relations’, Religious Studies, 46, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. (1978) ‘Logical operations’, Journal of Religion, 58, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Thomas (2015) An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology (Westmont IL: InterVarsity Academic Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy (2016) In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawl, Timothy (2019) In Defense of Extended Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1988) ‘And yet they are not three gods but one god’, in Morris, Thomas V. (ed.) Philosophy and the Christian Faith (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 241–278.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1994) ‘Not by confusion of substance, but by unity of person’, in Swinburne, Richard & Padgett, Alan G. (eds) Reason and the Christian Religion: Essays in Honour of Richard Swinburne (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 201–226.Google Scholar