Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:34:51.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the relationship between situated activity and CALL learning in teacher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Levi McNeil
Levi McNeil*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of TESOL, Sookmyung Women's University, South Korea (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Situated learning is often proposed as a model for CALL teacher education. However, we know little about how students perceive situated CALL coursework and activities, and the nature of the relationship between situated learning and CALL learning. This exploratory case study addresses these issues. Survey, questionnaire, and open-ended data were collected from 21 MA TESOL students enrolled in a CALL course in South Korea. The results showed that students perceived that the course offered many elements of situated learning environments, and that some course activities were more situated than others. Additionally, the relationship between situated learning and CALL was strong and positive. Implications for research into situated learning and CALL teacher education are discussed.

Keywords

situated learningCALL teacher educationcomputer-assisted language learningprofessional developmentauthentic activity
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 215 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, N., Ducate, L.Lomicka, L. (2007) Virtual communities of practice in teacher education. In: Kassen, M. A., Lavine, R. Z., Murphy-Judy, K. and Peters, M. (eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 103–132.Google Scholar
Bogdan, R. C.Biklen, S. K. (2006) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Group.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A.Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C.Jamieson, J. (2008) Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chao, C. (2006) How WebQuests send technology to the background: Scaffolding EFL teacher professional development in CALL. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debski, R. (2006) Theory and practice in teaching project-oriented CALL. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, F.Peters, M. (2007) Single-course approach versus a program approach to develop technological competence in pre-service language teachers. In: Kassen, M. A., Lavine, R. Z., Murphy-Judy, K. and Peters, M. (eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 3–21.Google Scholar
Dodge, B. (1997) Some thoughts about Webquests. http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2006) Learning in context: Situating language teacher learning in CALL. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J.Brander, B. (2010) A framework for situated online language teacher education: Learning to engage diverse students through culturally responsive CALL. In: Egbert, J. (ed.), CALL in limited technology contexts. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 135–144.Google Scholar
Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M.Nakamichi, Y. (2002) The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3): 108–126.Google Scholar
Hanson-Smith, E. (2006) Communities of practice for pre- and in-service teacher education. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegelheimer, V., Reppert, K., Broberg, M., Daisy, B., Grgurovic, M., Middlebrooks, K.Liu, S. (2004) Preparing the new generation of CALL practitioners and researchers: What nine months in a MA program can (or cannot) do. ReCALL, 16(2): 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrington, J.Oliver, R. (2000) An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrington, J., Oliver, R.Reeves, T. (2003) ‘Cognitive realism’ in online authentic learning environments. In: Lassner, D. and McNaught, C. (eds.), EdMedia World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Norfolk, VA: AACE, 2115–2121.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P.Levy, M. (2006) The scope of CALL education. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G. (2007) Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G.Plakans, L. (2008) Does teachers’ confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J.Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker-VanStrander, S., Tseng, C.You, J. (2006) Expert novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C., Mossop, J., DiAngelo, S.Pasquale, R. K. (2002) Expert and novice teachers talking technology: Precepts, concepts, and misconcepts. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3): 46–57.Google Scholar
Peters, M. (2006) Developing computer competencies for pre-service language teachers: Is one course enough? In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar