Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:37:03.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Robert Batterman
Robert Batterman*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As is weil known there has been an explosion of interest in classical dynarnics resulting from the relatively recent “discovery” that classical deterministic systems can be chaotic or in some sense random. Actually, their complexity had already been weil appreciated by Poincare in 1892 (MacKay, R. S. and Meiss, J. D. (1987), p. 7). Much interesting work is currently being done on classical chaos in both physics and philosophy. However, in the last fifteen years or so, the interest of some physicists has turned to the possibility that chaos, or chaotic behavior can be found in quantum mechanics as weil. Unfortunately, things are much less clear cut in the quantum case than in the classical. In fact, there is very little agreement about whether chaos in quantum mechanics even exists. In part this is because there is apparently no generally accepted definition of what chaos in quantum mechanics could be.

Type
Part II: Chaos Theory
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 50 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Footnotes

1

For helpful comments and discussions on earlier versions of this paper I would like to thank Roger Jones, Jim Joyce, Ron Laymon, Joe Mendola, and Mark Wilson. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SBE-9211983.

References

Batterman, R. W. (1993), “Theories Between Theories: Asymptotic Limiting Intertheoretic Relations,” Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Berry, M. V. (1983), “Semi-classical Mechanics of Regular and Irregular Motion”, Chaotic Behaviour of Deterministic Systems (Les Houches, Session 36), G.loos, R. G. H. Helleman, and R. Stora (eds.). Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 171-271.Google Scholar
Berry, M. V. (1987), “The Bakerian Lecture. Quantum Chaology”, Dynamical Chaos, M. V. Berry, I. C. Percival, and N. O. Weiss (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 183-198.Google Scholar
Berry, M. V. (1989), “Quantum Chaology, Not Quantum Chaos”, Physica Scripta 40: 335-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, M. V., Balazs, N. L., Tabor, M., and Voros, A. (1979), “Quantum Maps”, Annals of Physics 122: 26-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. (1967), The Mechanics of the Atom, Trans. J. W. Fischerand Revised D. R. Hartree. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Kramers, H. A. (1956), “Intensities of Spectral Lines”, in H. A. Kramers, Collected Scientific Papers. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1-108,.Google Scholar
MacKay, R. S. and Meiss, J. D. (1987), Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems: A Reprint Selection. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Miller, W. H. (1986), “Semiclassical Methods in Chemical Physics”, Science 23: 171-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder, H. (1991), “Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 195-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabor, M. (1989), Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Maslov, V. P. and Fedoriuk, M. V. (1981), Semiclassical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics, (Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathmetics; v. 7); trans. J. Niederle and J. Tolar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar