Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:20.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—The Law of Blackening of the Photographic Plate at Low Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

E. A. Baker
Get access

Extract

The following paper is ancillary to certain investigations in stellar photometry which are in progress at the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, and require the establishment of data relating to the blackening of the plates employed. It describes the laboratory work carried out for this purpose, generally over the very restricted range of exposure times and densities used in the stellar work, but occasionally extended to cover a wider field. The conditions are chosen in order to give the maximum accuracy and range to the stellar work and not with a view to highly accurate laboratory work; on the other hand, the periodical change of emulsion which must occur in any lengthy investigation introduces an element which, though of considerable interest, is lacking in most of the published work on the subject.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , 1926 , pp. 166 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SirAbney, W. de W., “Presidential Address,” Section A, British Association, B.A. Report, 1889, p. 487; Nature, 40, 1889, p. 472.Google Scholar
SirAbney, W. de W., “On the Failure of the Law in Photography …,” Proc. Roy. Soc., 54, 1893, p. 143.Google Scholar
SirAbney, W. de W., “On Errors that may arise in Estimating Star Magnitudes by Photography,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 54, 1893, p. 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baisch, E., ” Versuche zur Prüfung des Wien Plankschen Strahlungsgesetzes im Bereich kurzer Wellenlängen,” Ann. d. Physik, 35, 1911, p. 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A., and Werner, A., “Das photographische Reziprozitätsgesetz für Bromsilbergelatine bei Erregung mit Licht verschiedener Wellenlänge,” Zeits. wiss. Phot., 5, 1907, p. 382.Google Scholar
Brotherus, H. V., “Photometrische Untersuchung …” Phys. Zeit., 12, 1911, p. 193.Google Scholar
Channon, H. J., “Studies in Photographic Science,” Phot. Journ., 60, 1920, p. 164.Google Scholar
Charlier, C. V. L., “Ueber die Anwendung der Sternphotographie zu Helligkeitsmessungen der Sterne,” Astro. Gesellschaft Publ., 19, 1889; Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 50, 1890, p. 244.Google Scholar
Eder, J. M., Akad. Wiss. Wien Ber., 108, 1899, p. 1407.Google Scholar
Englisch, E., Archiv für wiss. Phot., 1, 1899, p. 117.Google Scholar
Englisch, E., “Das Schwärzungsgesetz,” Inaug. Diss., Halle, 1901.Google Scholar
Fizeau, A. H. L., and Foucault, J. B. L., “Recherches sur l'intensité de la lumière émise par le charbon dans l'expérience de Davy,” Comptes Rendus, 18, 1844, p. 746.Google Scholar
Geiger, L., “Über die Schwärzung und Photometrie photographischer Platten,” Ann. d. Physik, 37, 1912, p. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halm, J., “A System of Photographic Magnitudes for Southern Stars,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 74, 1914, p. 600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halm, J., “On the Determinations of Fundamental Photographic Magnitudes,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 75, 1915, p. 150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halm, J., “On the Determinations of Fundamental Photographic Magnitudes,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 78, 1918, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G. R., and Hesthal, C. E., “Photographic Photometry in the Ultraviolet,” Opt. Soc. Amer. Journ., 8, 1924, p. 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmick, P. S., “The Variation in the Blackening of a Photographic Plate with Time of Exposure, Total Energy remaining Constant,” Phys. Rev., 11, 1918, p. 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmick, P. S., “The Blackening of a Photographic Plate as a Function of Intensity of Light and Time of Exposure,” Phys. Rev., 17, 1921, p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henri, V., “Methode der quantitativen Messung der Absorption im Ultravioletten,” Phys. Zeit., 1913, p. 515.Google Scholar
Higson, G. I., “Action of Light on the Photographic Plate, the Schwarzschild Effect,” Phot. Journ., 61, 1921, pp. 35, 144.Google Scholar
Hnatek, B., “Die Abhängigkeit des Exponenten p im Schwarzschildschen Schwärzungsgesetz von der Wellenlänge,” Zeits. wiss. Phot., 22, 1923, p. 177.Google Scholar
Ives, H. E., “Some Photographic Phenomena bearing upon the Dispersion of Light in Space,” Astrophys. Journ., 31, 1910, p. 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. A., “A Special Sensitometer for the Study of the Photographic Reciprocity Law,” Opt. Soc. Amer. Journ., 7, 1923, p. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. A., and Huse, E., “On the Relation between Time and Intensity in Photographic Exposure,” Opt. Soc. Amer. Journ., 7, 1923, p. 1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, P. P., “Methoden der photographischen Spectralphotometrie,” Ann. d. Physik, 30, 1909, p. 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kron, E., “Über das Schwärzungsgesetz photographischer Trockenplatten,” Publ. des astrophys. Obs. zu Potsdam, 22, 1913, Nr. 67; Ann. d. Physik, 41, 1913, p. 751.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E., “Über die Bedeutung des Schwarzschildfactors für die praktische Sensitometrie,” Phot. Korrespondenz, 58, 1921, p. 87.Google Scholar
Leimbach, G., “Die absolute Strahlungsempfindlichkeit von Bromsilbergelatineplatten gegen Licht verschiedener Wellenlänge,” Zeits. wiss. Phot., 7, 1909, pp. 157, 181.Google Scholar
Leimbach, G., “Variiert p mit λ ?” Ann. d. Physik, 36, 1911, p. 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, R. A., “On the Failure of the Reciprocity Law in Photography,” Phil. Mag., 44, 1922, p. 904; 45, 1923, p. 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, C. E. K., “The Relation between Photographic Intensity and Exposure,” Publ. of the Amer. Astro. Soc., 4, 1923, p. 374.Google Scholar
Miethe, A., “Zur Actinometrie astronomisch-photographischer Fixsternaufnahmen,” Inaug. Diss., Göttingen, 1899.Google Scholar
Odencrants, A., Fot. Tidschrift, 20, 1907, p. 178.Google Scholar
Odencrants, A., “Untersuchungen über Intensitäts- und Intermittenz-schwächung,” Zeits. wiss. Phot., 16, 1917, pp. 111, 125, 189.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J. A., “The Evidence from Photographic Colorfilters in regard to the Absorption of Light in Space,” Astrophys. Journ., 30, 1909, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, W. H., “Investigations in Astronomical Photography,” Harvard Annals, 32, 1895, p. 20.Google Scholar
Plotnikow, Phot. Korrespondenz, 703, 1919, p. 126.Google Scholar
Precht, J., “Neuere Untersuchungen über die Gultigkeit des Bunsen-Roscoe'schen Gesetzes für Bromsilbergelatine,” Arch. wiss. Phot., 1, 1899, p. 187.Google Scholar
Pritchard, C., “Further Experience regarding the Magnitude of Stars as Obtained by Photography,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N., 51, 1891, p. 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranyard, A. C., “On the Connection between Photographic Action, the Brightness of the Luminous Object, and the Time of Exposure,” Roy. Astro. Soc. M.N, 46, 1886, p. 305.Google Scholar
Raphaels, , l'hot. Arch., 1896, p. 245.Google Scholar
Renwick, F. F., “Photographic Photometry and the Measure of Densities,” Phot. Journ., 52, 1912, pp. 250, 260.Google Scholar
Ross, F. E., “Relation between Photographic Density, Light Intensity, and Exposure Time; a New Formula; the Reciprocity Law,” Opt. Soc. Amer. Journ., 4, 1920, p. 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schell, C., Inaug. Diss., Leipzig, 1910.Google Scholar
Schellen, A., “Ueber die Gultigkeit des Bunsen-Roscoe'schen Gesetzes für Bromsilbergelatine,” Inaug. Diss., Rostock, 1898; Arch. wiss. Phot., 1, 1899, p. 57.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, K., “Über die Wirkung intermittierender Belichtung auf Bromsilbergelatine,” Phot. Korrespondenz, 36, 1899, p. 171; Astrophys. Journ., 11, 1900, p. 89.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, K., “Beiträge zur photographischen Photometrie der Gestirne,” Publ. der v. Kuffner'schen Sternwarte, Wien, 5, 1900.Google Scholar
Sheppard, S. E., and Mees, C. E. K., Investigations on the Theory of the Photographic Process, London, Longmans, Green, 1907, p. 214.Google Scholar
Slade, R. E., and Higson, G. I., “Photochemical Investigations of the Photographic Plate,” Roy. Soc. Proc., 98, 1920, p. 154.Google Scholar
Spurge, J. B., Journ. Cam. Club, 1893, p. 60.Google Scholar
Stark, J., “Über das Schwärzungsgesetz der Normalbelichtung und über photographische Spectralphotometrie,” Ann. d. Physik, 35, 1911, p. 461; Phys. Zeits., 12, 1911, p. 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tikhoff, G. A., “Études nouvelles sur l'application des filtres sélecteurs à la recherche de l'absorption cosmique sélective,” Mitt. der Nicolai-Hauptsternwarte zu Pulkowo, 3, 1909, p. 31; Comptes Rendus, 148, 1909, p. 266.Google Scholar
Vegard, L., “Über die Lichterzeugung in Glimmlicht und Kanalstrahlen,” Ann. d. Physik, 39, 1912, p. 121.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J., and Lemon, H. B., “On the Evaluation of the Reciprocity Law, Basic Fog, and Preliminary Exposure,” Astrophys. Journ., 29, 1909, p. 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. E., “Über die Anwendung des rotierenden Sektors zur photographischen Photometrie,” Inaug. Diss., München; Ann. d. Physik, 45, 1914, p. 801.Google Scholar
Werner, A., “Das photographische Reziprozitätsgesetz bei sensibilisierten Bromsilbergelatinen,” Inaug. Diss., Kiel, 1907; Ann. d. Physik, 24, 1907, p. 164; Zeits. wiss. Phot., 6, 1908, p. 25.Google Scholar