Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:56:23.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of high-fat overfeeding on white adipose tissue and systemic metabolic and inflammatory responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Rebecca Dewhurst-Trigg ,
Rachel M. Woods ,
Carl J. Hulston  and
Oonagh Markey
Rebecca Dewhurst-Trigg
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Rachel M. Woods
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Carl J. Hulston
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Oonagh Markey
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

White adipose tissue (WAT) inflammation is linked to the development of cardiometabolic disease. A high intake of saturated fatty acids (SFA) may promote a more pro-inflammatory WAT gene expression profile, compared to monounsaturated fatty acids(1,2). This is concerning as the UK adult population currently exceeds the SFA intake target of < 10% total energy (TE), at 11.9%TE(3). However, further research is needed to understand how SFA ingestion impacts the protein content and phosphorylation of key targets involved in WAT inflammatory signalling. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of short-term, high-fat overfeeding on WAT and systemic metabolic and inflammatory responses in healthy, non-obese individuals.

Fifteen (9 men, 6 women) apparently healthy participants (mean (SE) age; 26.6 (1.2) y, BMI; 24.4 (0.6) kg/m2) consumed a high-fat (dietary target: 65.0%TE total fat; 32.5%TE SFA), high-calorie (+ 50% estimated energy requirements) diet for 7 days. Fasted venous blood and WAT samples were collected pre- and post-intervention.

Body mass increased following the intervention (pre-intervention vs. post-intervention: 75.2 (2.9) kg vs. 76.4 (2.9) kg; P < 0.0001). The intervention also led to increases in glucose (4.4 (0.1) vs. 4.6 (0.1) mmol/L; P = 0.022) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (12.9 (1.3) vs. 17.7 (3.0) μg/mL; P = 0.038), and a decrease in triacylglycerol (0.91 (0.08) vs. 0.72 (0.05) mmol/L; P = 0.007). Insulin, IL-6 and soluble CD14 concentrations remained unchanged (all P > 0.05). At the WAT level, total protein (TLR4; NF-κB; IKβα; P38; MCP-1) and phosphorylation (p) of proteins (p-NF-κB; p-IKβα; p-P38) involved in inflammatory signalling were unchanged following the intervention (all P > 0.05).

In conclusion, although short-term, high-fat overfeeding led to an increase in body mass as well as systemic metabolic alterations, the content and phosphorylation of proteins involved in WAT inflammatory signalling were unaltered in healthy, non-obese individuals. Further analysis will reveal the impact of high-fat overfeeding on peripheral blood monocyte populations, which are involved in mediating pro- and anti-inflammatory responses.

This research was supported by a Society for Endocrinology Early Career Grant.

Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 79 , Issue OCE2: 13th European Nutrition Conference, FENS 2019, 15–18 October 2019, Malnutrition in an Obese World: European Perspectives , 2020 , E364
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2020

References

Finucane, OM, Lyons, CL, Murphy, AM et al. . (2015) Diabetes 64, 2116–2128.10.2337/db14-1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, SJ, Feskens, EJM, Bos, MB et al. . (2009) Am J Clin Nutr 90, 1656–1664.10.3945/ajcn.2009.27792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2018) Results from Years 7 and 8 (combined) of the rolling programme (2014/2015 to 2015/2016). London. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-results-from-years-7-and-8-combined [Accessed 04 April 2019]Google Scholar