Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:32:10.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of a tier 3 weight management programme for children and young people in a deprived area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2015

R. P. G. Hayhoe
Affiliation:
Population Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ
M. Haddow
Affiliation:
Healthy Weight Team, James Paget University Hospital, Lowestoft Rd, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk NR31 6LA
J. Shareef
Affiliation:
Healthy Weight Team, James Paget University Hospital, Lowestoft Rd, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk NR31 6LA
S. Barnes
Affiliation:
Public Health, Norfolk County Council, County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich NR1 2DH
A. A. Welch
Affiliation:
Population Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Childhood obesity is a major public health concern which has seen a rapid upward trend since the 1980s(1). The long-term impact on health is potentially severe as it frequently tracks into adulthood(Reference Serdula, Ivery and Coates2). Comorbidities traditionally associated with adult obesity are now commonly seen in obese children, including cardiovascular disease risk factors, type 2 diabetes, musculoskeletal issues, and respiratory complications such as sleep apnoea and asthma(Reference Ebbeling, Pawlak and Ludwig3).

The Healthy Weight tier 3 weight management service provides a novel specialist programme for obese children and young people (CYP) in Great Yarmouth and Waveney, where obesity prevalence is significantly higher than East of England and national averages(4). This population group has significant deprivation, and prevalence of behavioural and learning difficulties, which together with difficult family situations are likely to be contributing to increased risk of obesity, as well as presenting barriers to engagement and effective weight management. The multi-component programme follows NICE guidelines (CG43) and is available to all local CYP with BMI >98th percentile for their age (UK90 reference cohort), or >91st percentile with complex needs. The focus is on healthy lifestyle promotion by regular weight measurement, weight management discussion, dietary advice, and physical activity referral. Provision is tailored to each individual, based on specialist clinical assessment.

Change in obesity status was assessed at follow-up time points of 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Standard protocols were used to measure height and waist circumference and a Tanita BC420MA was used to measure total weight and bioelectrical impedence-estimated muscle mass. BMI z-scores were used as the primary outcome measure as recommended by NICE guidance (CG47), with waist-height ratio (WHtR) and fat free muscle index (FFMI), providing more detail of the change in body weight and composition achieved.

The mean age of those enrolled in the service was 10·8 (SD 4·0) and 60% were girls. 64% resided in areas ranked in the two most deprived national quintiles according to the 2010 Index of Multiple Deprivation. Statistically significant mean reductions in paired BMI z-scores and WHtR were evident at all follow-up points 3–18 months. Together with increases in FFMI this demonstrates improvement in obesity status and body composition.

Although this was an evaluation without a control group for comparison, results suggest this unique service has provided a successful programme of obesity treatment, monitoring and onward referral, to very obese CYP in Great Yarmouth and Waveney. Given the complexities of engaging this population the positive changes observed here are a significant achievement and provide support for implementation of similar programmes elsewhere.

*p < 0·05, **p < 0·01, ***p < 0·001 versus baseline (two-tailed paired sample t-test). Baseline WHtR and FFMI measurement may not have been at first appointment.

References

1.POST (2003) Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology POSTnote 03/205.Google Scholar
2.Serdula, MK, Ivery, D, Coates, RJ, et al. (1993) Prev Med 22, 167177.Google Scholar
3.Ebbeling, CB, Pawlak, DB and Ludwig, DS (2002) Lancet 360, 473482.Google Scholar
4.Public Health England (2013) Fingertips Public Health Profiles, available at fingertips.phe.org.uk.Google Scholar