Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:25:50.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ageing Characteristics of the Weibull Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Pushpa L. Gupta  and
Ramesh C. Gupta
Pushpa L. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469-5752
Ramesh C. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469-5752
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is well known that mixtures of decreasing failure rate (DFR) distributions have the DFR property. A similar result is, of course, not true for increasing failure rate (IFR) distributions. In a recent note, Gurland and Sethuraman (1994, Technometrks36(4): 416–418) presented two examples where mixtures of IFR distributions show DFR property. In this paper, we present a general approach to study the mixtures of distributions and show that the failure rates of the unconditional and conditional distributions cross at most at one point. Mixtures of Weibull distribution with a shape parameter greater than 1 are examined in detail. This also enables us to study the monotonic properties of the mean residual life function of the mixture. Some examples are provided to illustrate the results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 591 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aalen, O.O. (1988). Heterogeneity in survival analyses. Statistics in Medicine 7: 1121–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Aalen, O.O. (1992). Modelling heterogeneity in survival analysis by the compound Poisson distribution. Annals of Applied Probability 2(4): 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Al-Hussaini, E.K. & Abd-El-Hakim, N.S. (1989). Failure rate of inverse Gaussian Weibull model. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Math 41(3): 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bennett, S. (1983). Log-logistic regression models for survival data. Applied Statistics 32(2): 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cox, D.R. (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 34(13): 187–220.Google Scholar
6.Cox, D.R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
7.Glaser, R.E. (1980). Bathtub and related failure rate characterizations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75(351): 667–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gupta, R.C. & Akman, H.O. (1995). Mean residual life function for certain types of nonmonotonic ageing. Stochastic Models 11(1): 219–225.Google Scholar
9.Gurland, J. & Sethuraman, J. (1994). Reversal of increasing failure rates when pooling failure data. Technometrics 36(4): 416–418.Google Scholar
10.Jaisingh, L.R., Dey, D.K., & Griffith, W.S. (1993). Properties of multivariate survival distribution generated by a Weibull & inverse-Gaussian mixture. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 42(4): 618–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Whitmore, G.A. & Lee, M.L.T. (1991). A multivariate survival distribution generated by an inverse Gaussian mixture of exponentials. Technometrics 33(1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Wingo, D.R. (1993). Maximum likelihood methods for fitting the Burr type XII distribution to multiply (progressively) censored life test data. Metrika 40: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar