Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:16:31.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transforming a Department, Transforming a Discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2014

Cynthia R. Daniels
Cynthia R. Daniels*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Department of Political Science at Rutgers has a deep and sustained commitment to the principle of diversity. A diverse scholarly community is crucial to the development of cutting edge social science research, the recruitment and training of diverse graduate students, the quality of pedagogical experiences in our undergraduate classrooms and to the vibrancy and life of the University. (unanimously affirmed, May 2011)

In the fall of 2009, I became the first woman chair of the political science department at Rutgers University. I entered the position on the heels of a major gender discrimination case involving all of the women in the department, who claimed salary inequities and also put forward a series of informal complaints about hostile work environment. The case had taken two years to settle and, at its conclusion, the dean of the School of Arts and Sciences suggested that the department consider electing one of the women as chair. Needless to say, the challenges before the department were quite daunting.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 464 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander-Floyd, Nikol G. 2008. “‘Written, Published,...Cross-indexed and Footnoted’: Producing Black Female PhDs and Black Women's and Gender Studies Scholarship in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 819–29.Google Scholar
Alex-Assensoh, Yvette M., Givens, Terri, Golden, Kathie, Hutchings, Vincent L., Wallace, Sherri L., and Whitby, Kenny J.. 2005. “Mentoring and African-American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (2): 283–85.Google Scholar
APSA Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. 2011. “Political Science in the 21st Century.” http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/TF_21st%20Century_Allpgs_webres90.pdf (accessed February 4, 2014).Google Scholar
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. http://www.niu.edu/engagedlearning/research/pdfs/Boyer_Report.pdf (accessed February 4, 2014).Google Scholar
Malcom, Lindsey E., and Malcom, Shirley M.. 2011. “The Double Bind: The Next Generation.” Harvard Educational Review 81 (2): 162–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcom, Shirley M., Hall, Paula Quick, and Brown, Janet Welsh. 1976. “The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science.” Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Misra, Joya, Lundquist, Jennifer Hickes, Holmes, Elissa, and Agiomavritis, Stephanie. 2011. “The Ivory Ceiling of Service Work | AAUP.” http://www.aaup.org/article/ivory-ceiling-service-work# (accessed February 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Monforti, Jessica Lavariega, and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2008. “Diagnosing the Leaky Pipeline: Continuing Barriers to the Retention of Latinas and Latinos in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 161–66.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa L., Henderson, Andrea Davies, and Gilmartin, Shannon K.. 2008. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2006. “‘Far from Ideal’: The Gender Politics of Political Science.” The American Political Science Review 100 (4): 507–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar