Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:50:38.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How an Intersectional Approach Can Help to Transform the University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2014

Lisa García Bedolla
Lisa García Bedolla*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Advocates have been striving for decades to improve the representation of women and people of color in the academy. The results in political science have been fairly limited. From 1980 to 2010, the proportion of women among white political science faculty grew from 9.6% to 24.8% (APSA 2011, 44). Even with this sizable increase, women constituted fewer than a quarter of white political scientists. Within their respective ethnoracial groups, women of color made up a greater proportion of political science faculty but remain woefully underrepresented in the profession, with only 79 Latino, 161 African American, and 117 Asian American female political science faculty nationally in 2010 (APSA 2011, 44–46). Overall, the proportion of scholars of color within political science during this period, male and female, has remained largely flat; in 2010, 88.9% of political science faculty were white. In this essay, I argue that an intersectional approach to thinking about this issue—one that acknowledges the marginalization and privilege that cut across faculty within departments and universities—raises the possibility of changing the conversation about inclusion, potentially opening up new possibilities for making substantive change within political science departments and universities.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 447 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alinsky, Saul. 1989. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association, Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. 2011. “Political Science in the 21st Century.” Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Beltrán, Cristina. 2010. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
García Bedolla, Lisa. 2005. Fluid Borders: Latino Power, Identity and Politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
García Bedolla, Lisa. 2007. “Intersections of Inequality: Understanding Marginalization and Privilege in the Post Civil-Rights Era.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 232–48.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2011. Solidarity Politics for Millennials: A Guide to Ending the Oppression Olympics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, Laurel. 2008. “Difference and Social Structure: Iris Young's Legacy of a Critical Social Theory of Gender” Politics & Gender 4 (2): 311–17.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar