Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Philosophy of Science
  4. Volume 31
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 31 - October 1964

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Discussion

Research Article

  • Discussion: A Reply to Mr. Mattick's Article on Marxism and the New Physics

  • Manfred S. Frings
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2022, pp. 289-293

  • It will be recalled that Mr. Mattick stated that Marxism does not derive its social theory from physical theory, and that any attempt to do so is an aberration from marxism. It is maintained that Marx is not a determinist or indeterminist in the ususal sense of these terms. Furthermore, it was argued that ideologies are no longer decisive weapons and that Marxists put little trust in the dialectical course of history.

Book Reviews

Discussion

Research Article

  • Discussion: Physical and Social Facts in Anthropology

  • J. A. Barnes
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2022, pp. 294-297

  • In his recent paper Gellner singles me out for special comment and some reply is called for. He attributes to me several propositions which he says I made in my note on ‘Physical and social kinship’ in this journal, and he then refutes them. Reading his paper I cannot avoid thinking that he exaggerates the differences between us, thereby apparently strengthening his argument. Some substantial differences there are, but others are fictional. A line-by-line analysis of what he says about me in his paper might be amusing but would be of only ephemeral interest. In this reply I confine myself to a few important issues.

Book Reviews

Discussion

Other

Book Reviews

Other

Book Reviews

Other

Book Reviews

Other

Front matter

  • PSA volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2022, pp. f1-f5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • PSA volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2022, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • PSA volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2022, pp. b1-b2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 3