Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:07:20.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Royal Wills and Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

David Braund
Get access

Disposizioni testamentarie reali e roma

La prima metà di questo articolo è una raccolta di tutta le disposizioni testamentarie reali concernenti Roma dal III secolo a.c. al I secolo d.c. Questi testamenti comprendono lasciti di interi regni nonchè legati minori, e la nomina del popolo romano a tutore degli eredi del re.

La seconda parte esplora la logica che si trova dietro queste disposizioni: perchè i re le prendevano? Vengono studiate varie possibilità, ma tutte sono considerate più o meno insoddisfacenti: particolare attenzione viene dedicata alla possibilità che i re facessero lasciti a Roma per rendere più sicura la loro posizione mentre erano in vita. Si sostiene che i re facessero questi testamenti nel contesto della loro amicizia e alleanza con Roma. I re coinvolgevano l'amica Roma nel testamento quasi come i privati nominano gli amici nel testamento. Così, quando un re non aveva figli che gli succedessero, poteva fare un lascito del suo regno a Roma. Se aveva figli, poteva nominare l'amica Roma loro tutrice. Similmente, poteva lasciare legati a Roma, come chiunque può fare con un amico.

Type
Research Article
Information
Papers of the British School at Rome , Volume 51 , November 1983 , pp. 16 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © British School at Rome 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Africa, T. W. (1961). ‘Aristonicus, Blossius and the City of the Sun‘, International Review of Social History vi 110–24.Google Scholar
Alföldi, M. R. (1979), ‘Die Geschichte des numidischen Königreiches und seiner Nachfolger’, in Horn, H. G. and Rüger, C. B. (edd.), Die Numider (1979).Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1974), Noricum.Google Scholar
Applebaum, S. (1979), Jews and Greeks in ancient Cyrene.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, V. (1936), ‘Epigrafia giuridica greca e romana’, SDHI ii, 482–90.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1967), Scipio Aemilianus.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978), Cato the Censor.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1958), Foreign Clientelae, 264–70 B.C.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1965), ‘M. Porcius Cato and the annexation and early administration of Cyprus’, JRS lv 110–21.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1967), ‘The testament of Ptolemy Alexander’, Rh. Mus. cx 178–92.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1968a), Roman imperialism in the late Republic (2nd. edn.).Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1968b), Review of Heinen (1966), JRS Iviii, 258–9.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1972), ‘Tiberius Gracchus and the beginning of the Roman revolution,’, ANRW I. 1, 668–731.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1980), Review of Hopp (1977), JRS lxx, 200–3.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1972), ‘Stolos the admiral’, Phoenix xxvi, 358–68.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1976), The administration of the Ptolemaic possessions outside Egypt.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1954), ‘Rome and Macedon, 205–200 B.C.’, JRS xliv, 30–42.Google Scholar
Bernstein, A. H. (1978), Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus: tradition and apostasy.Google Scholar
Bickermann, E. J. (1932), Review of Oliverio (1932), Gnomon viii, 424–30.Google Scholar
Bloedow, E. (1963), Beiträge zur Geschichte des Ptolemaios XII.Google Scholar
Bouché-Leclercq, A. (1904), Histoire des Lagides ii.Google Scholar
Boulvert, G. (1974), Domestique et fonctionnaire sous le haut-empire romain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. C. (1980a), ‘The Aedui, Troy and the Apocolocyntosis’, CQ xxx, 420–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. C. (1980b), Review of Cimma (1976), JRS lxx, 203.Google Scholar
Braund, D. C. (1982), ‘Three hellenistic personages: Amynander, Prusias II, Daphidas’, CQ xxxii, 350–7.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1969), ‘Eastern policy and senatorial politics, 168–146 B.C.’, Historia xviii, 49–70.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1973), A Commentary on Liny, Books xxxi–iii.Google Scholar
Byrne, F. J. (1973), Irish kings and high-kings.Google Scholar
Calhoun, G. M. (1914), ‘Documentary frauds in litigation at Athens’, CPh ix, 134–44.Google Scholar
Camps, G. (1960), Massinissa ou les débuts de l'histoire.Google Scholar
Cardinali, G. (1910), ‘La morte di Attalo III e la rivolta di Aristonico’, in Saggi di storia antica e di archeologia offerti a G. Beloch 269–320.Google Scholar
Carrata Thomes, F. (1968), La rivolta di Aristonico e le origini della provincia romana d'Asia.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. (1922), Römische Studien.Google Scholar
Cimma, M. R. (1976), Reges socii et amici populi Romani.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1974), Röman Republican coinage.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1957), ‘A legal point about Mark Antony's will’, JRS xlvii, 36–8.Google Scholar
Demicheli, A. M. (1976), Rapporti di pace e diguerra dell'Egitto romano con le popolazioni dei deserti africani.Google Scholar
Deng, F. M. (1973), The Dinka and their songs.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, G. (1932), ‘Il primo testamento regio a favore dei Romani’, RFIC x, 59–67.Google Scholar
Doran, R. (1981), Temple propaganda: the purpose and character of 2 Maccabees.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R., and Webster, G. (1962), The rebellion of Boudicca.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. W. (1967), The Breviarium of Festus.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. W. B. (1979), Numidia and the Roman army.Google Scholar
Frere, S. S. (1978), Britannia.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. D. A. (1978), ‘Rome's African empire under the Principate’, in Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker, C. R. (edd.), Imperialism in the ancient world.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L. (1967), ‘Due nuovi apporti epigrafici alla storia di Cirene romana’, Quaderni di archeologia della Libia v, 53–64.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1968), Caesar: politician and statesman (transl.).Google Scholar
Glew, D. (1977), ‘Mithridates Eupator and Rome: a study of the background of the First Mithri datic War’, Athenaeum lv, 380–405.Google Scholar
Glew, D. (1981), ‘Between the wars: Mithridates Eupator and Rome, 85–73 B.C.’, Chiron xi, 109–30.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (ed., 1966), Succession to high office.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F., and Page, D. L. (1968), The garland of Philip.Google Scholar
Gsell, S. (1928), Histoire ancienne de l'Afrique du nurd.Google Scholar
Guizzi, F. (1962), ‘Miti e politica nella capacità successoria del “Populus Romanus”,’ Labeo viii, 169–205.Google Scholar
Gwatkin, W. E. (1930), Cappadocia as a Roman procuratorial province.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1976), ‘Royal documents in Maccabees II‘, HSCPh lxxx, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. V. (1971), The Attalids of Pergamon (2nd. edn.).Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1979), War and imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C.Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C. (1977), Review of Alföldy (1974), JRS lxvii, 231–2.Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C., Crawford, M. H., and Reynolds, J. M. (1974), ‘Rome and the eastern provinces at the end of the second century B.C.’, JRS lxiv, 195–220.Google Scholar
Heinen, H. (1966), Rom und Ägypten von 51 bis 47 v. Chr.Google Scholar
Heinen, H. (1972), ‘Die politische Beziehungen zwischen Rom und dem Ptolemäerreich von ihren Anfängen bis zum Tag von Eleusis (273–168 v. Chr.)’, ANRW I.l, 633–59.Google Scholar
Hoben, W. (1969), Untersuchungen zur Stellung kleinasiatischer Dynasten in den Machtkämpfen der ausgehenden römischen Republik.Google Scholar
Hopp, J. (1977), Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der letzten Attalidenn.Google Scholar
Hülsen, C. (1888), ‘Nota sopra i nomi doppi di servi e liberti della casa imperiale’, MDAI (Rom) iii, 222–32.Google Scholar
Huss, W. (1976), Untersuchungen zur Aussenpolitik Ptolemaios’ IV.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. (1979), ‘Queen Boudicca?’, Britannia x, 255.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M., (1967), The Herods of Judaea (repr.).Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1971), Das römische Privatrecht (2nd. edn.).Google Scholar
Kniessl, P. (1979), ‘Zur Entstehung der Provinz Noricum’, Chiron ix, 261–73.Google Scholar
Lemosse, M. (1964), ‘A propos des royaumes legués au peuple romain’, Synteleia V. Arangio-Ruiz 280–5.Google Scholar
Lemosse, M. (1967), Le régime des relations internationales dans le haut-empire romain.Google Scholar
Levick, B. (1967), Roman colonies in southern Asia Minor.Google Scholar
Liebmann-Frankfort, T. (1966), ‘Valeur juridique et signification politique des testaments faits par les rois hellénistiques en faveur des Romains’, RIDA xiii, 73–94.Google Scholar
Liebmann-Frankfort, T. (1969), La frontière orientale dans la politique exterieure de la République romaine depuis le traité d'Apamée jusqu' à la fin des conquêtes asiatiques de Pompée (189/8–63 av. J-C).Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. A. (ed., n.d.), Excavations at Sidi Khrebish, Benghazi (Berenice) i.Google Scholar
McGing, B. C. (1980), ‘Appian, Manius Aquillius and Phrygia’, GRBS xxi, 35–42.Google Scholar
Magie, D. (1950), Roman rule in Asia Minor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. (1977), The emperor in the Roman world.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. D. (1934), Ricerche sull'organizzazione della Giudea sotto il dominio romano (63 a.C.–70 d.C).Google Scholar
Moretti, L. (1976), ‘Un decreto di Arsinoe in Cirenaica’, RFIC civ, 385–98.Google Scholar
Mossop, H. R. (1979), ‘An elusive Icenian legend’, Britannia x 258–9.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1978), Rome et la conquête du monde méditerranéen ii.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M. (1978), A commentary on Horace Odes, Book ii.Google Scholar
Oliverio, G. (1932), La stele di Tolemeo Neoteros, re di Cirene.Google Scholar
Olshausen, E. (1963), Rom und Ägypten von 116 bis 51 v.Chr.Google Scholar
Oost, S. I. (1955), ‘Cato Uticensis and the annexation of Cyprus’, CPh 1, 98–112.Google Scholar
Oost, S. I. (1963), ‘Cyrene, 96–74 B.C.’, CPh lviii, 11–25.Google Scholar
Otto, W. (1934), Zur Geschichte der Zeit des 6. Ptolemäers.Google Scholar
Perl, G. (1970), ‘Die romischen Provinzbeamten in Cyrenae und Creta zur Zeit der Republik’, Klio lii, 319–29.Google Scholar
Piattelli, D. (1971), ‘Ricerche intorno alle relazioni politiche fra Roma e la Giudea dal 161 a.C. al 4 a.C.’, BIDR xiii, 219–340.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. (1933), ‘Observations sur le testament de Ptolémée le Jeune, roi de Cyrène’, RHDFE xii, 409–23.Google Scholar
Préaux, C. (1978), Le monde hellénistique.Google Scholar
Raditsa, L. (1969–1970), ‘The historical context of Mithridates‘ description of the status of Asia in Sallust's Letter of Mithridates’, Helikon ix/x, 689–94.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1972), ‘Cicero the historian and Cicero the antiquarian’, JRS lxii, 33–45.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. M. (1962), ‘Cyrenaica, Pompey and Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Marcellinus’, JRS lii, 97–103.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. (1979), ‘Polybius‘ view of the Roman empire’, PBSR xlvii, 1–11.Google Scholar
Rigsby, K. J. (1980), ‘Seleucid notes’, TAPhA ex, 233–54.Google Scholar
Romanelli, P. (1959), Storia delle province romane dell'Africa.Google Scholar
Roussel, P. (1932), ‘Le testament du roi de Cyrène’, REG xlv, 286–92.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. (1982), Personal patronage under the Early Empire.Google Scholar
Saumagne, C. (1966), La Numidie et Rome.Google Scholar
Schubart, W. (1932), ‘παρακατατίθεσθαι in der hellenistischen Amtssprache’, Phil. Woch. Iii, 1077–84.Google Scholar
Schürer, E. (1973), The history of the Jewish people in the age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C.–A.D. 135) (revd. Vermes, G. and Millar, F.) i.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. (1973), Roman politics, 220–150 B.C.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (1979), Pompey: a political biography.Google Scholar
Segre, M. (1932), ‘Il testamento di Tolemeo Neoteros’, Il Mondo Classico ii, 242–36.Google Scholar
Shatzman, I. (1971), ‘The Egyptian question in Roman politics, 59–54 B.C.’, Latomus xxx, 363–9.Google Scholar
Sherk, R. K. (1951), The legates of Galatia from Augustus to Diocletian.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1973), The Roman citizenship (2nd. edn.).Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1977a), ‘Roman involvement in Anatolia, 167–88 B.C.’, JRS lxvii, 62–75.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1977b), ‘Ariobarzanes, Mithridates and Sulla’, CQ xxvii, 173–83.Google Scholar
Smallwood, E. M. (1976), The Jews under Roman rule.Google Scholar
Spence, J. D. (1974), Emperor of China.Google Scholar
Stockton, D. (1979), The Gracchi.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. D. (1979), ‘Thrace in the eastern dynastic network’, ANRW II, 7. 1, 186–211.Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. (1913), Antigonus Gonatas.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. A. (1981), ‘Carthage and the Massylian coup d'état of 206 B.C.’, Historia xxx, 120–6.Google Scholar
Tod, M. N. (1932), ‘Greek inscriptions. III. The bequest of Cyrene to Rome’, G and R ii, 47–51.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1962), ‘Trimalchio Maecenatianus’, Hommages à A. Grenier 1617–24.Google Scholar
Vitucci, G. (1953), Il regno di Bitinia.Google Scholar
Voci, P. (1967), Diritto ereditario romano i 2.Google Scholar
Vogt, J. (1974), Ancient slavery and the ideal of man (transl.).Google Scholar
Wachholder, B. Z. (1962), Mcolaus of Damascus.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1940), Philip V of Macedon.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1967 and 1979), A historical commentary on Polybius ii and iii.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1965), ‘Massinissa’, JRS lv, 149–60.Google Scholar
Ward, A. M. (1977), ‘Caesar and the pirates. II. The elusive M. Iunius Iuncus and the year 75/4 B.C.’, AJAH ii, 26–36.Google Scholar
Watson, A. A. (1971), The law of succession in the later Roman Republic.Google Scholar
Weaver, P. R. C. (1972), Familia Caesaris.Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1936), ‘Zum Testamente des Ptolemaios Neoteros von Kyrene’, Studi in onore di S. Riccobono i, 527–48.Google Scholar
Wiesner, J. (1963), Die Thraker.Google Scholar
Wilcken, U. (1932), ‘Das Testament des Ptolemaios von Kyrene vom Jahre 155 v. Chr.’, Sitzungsberichte phil.-hist. Klasse 317–36.Google Scholar
Will, E. (1967 and 1979), Histoire politique du monde hellénistique ii and i2.Google Scholar
Winkler, H. (1933), Rom und Ägypten im 2. Jhdt. v. Chr.Google Scholar
Youroukova, Y. (1976), Coins of the ancient Thracians (transl.).Google Scholar