Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:44:04.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-recordings as a social activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Signe Schøning  and
Janus Spindler Møller
Signe Schøning
Affiliation:
The LANCHART Centre, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 136, 2300 København S, Denmark. [email protected], [email protected]
Janus Spindler Møller
Affiliation:
The LANCHART Centre, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 136, 2300 København S, Denmark. [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, self-recorded interactions from two studies of verbal interaction in Denmark are analysed using key concepts from Erving Goffman's frame analysis and Don Zimmerman's theory of identities in talk. It is documented how the recorder is integrated into everyday interaction as soon as the informant in his or her capacity as temporary fieldworker has explained the reason for its being there and has obtained the permission from his or her partners to record them. In several excerpts ascribed identities and using the recorder as an addressee are used to create amusement and to exploit the possibilities for supplying the innocent overhearing researcher with new and shocking information. The question of language norms during recorded sessions was raised in conversations in both studies and the limits of privacy were brought up.

Keywords

ascribed identitiescastinginteraction analyseskeyingself-recordings
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 32 , Special Issue 2: Sociolinguistics , December 2009 , pp. 245 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ag, Astrid. Forthcoming. At gøre være storesøster. To appear in Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism (2010).Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Carlson, Thomas B.. 1982. Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58 (2), 332–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganuza, Natalia. 2008. Syntactic Variation in the Swedish of Adolescents in Multilingual Urban Settings: Subject–Verb Order in Declaratives, Questions and Subordinate Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip J. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffmann, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. Normann. Forthcoming. Poly-lingual Languaging: Nine Years of Poly-lingual Development of Young Turkish–Danish Grade School Students. Copenhagen: Danish University of Education (2010).Google Scholar
Kristensen, Kjeld. 1980. Situationsafhængig sprogbrug hos vestjyske skoleelever. Danske folkemål 22 (2), 29–124. København: Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Møller, Janus Spindler. 2008. Polylingual performance among Turkish-Danes in late-modern Copenhagen. International Journal of Multilingualism 5 (3), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Janus Spindler & Jørgensen, J. N.. 2008. Poly-lingual languaging in group interaction. NordAnd 3 (2), 39–56.Google Scholar
Ng, Sik Hung & Bradac, James J.. 1993. Power in Language. Newbury Park, CA; London & New Dehli: Sage.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing, Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2006. Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, John. 1987. The sociolinguistic paradox: Data as a methodological product. Language and Communcation 7 (2), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. 1998. Identity, context and interaction. In Antaki, Charles & Widdicombe, Sue (eds.), Identities in Talk, 87–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar