No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
It is generally assumed that Rom. xv. 23–8, when read in conjunction with I Cor. xvi. 5–9, puts beyond question both the occasion on which Romans was written and the priority of I Corinthians. But a comparative study of the two Epistles provides a body of evidence which cannot be reconciled with this assumption, for it would seem to imply the priority of Romans in a chronological relationship with the Corinthians letter that is so close that the ink of the one could hardly have been dry before the amanuensis was engaged on the other.
1 The Body, p. 58.
1 Bell, H. I., Jews and Christians in Egypt, p. 28.Google Scholar
2 See Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, 4th edn., pp. 345, n. 4, 353–4, 364–5.Google Scholar