Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:26:07.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Judaean Scrolls. 1. The Judaean Scrolls and the New Testament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Driver, , p. 450, and p. 568 where further reference is made to the ‘white raiment’ or ‘white robes’ and the ‘crown of glory’ to which Christians looked forward in a future life.Google Scholar

2 Driver, pp. 460 ff.

1 See Starcky, J. in Revue Biblique, lxx (1963), 481 ff.Google Scholar, and Woude, A. S. van der, Die messianischen Vorstellungen der Gemeinde von Qumran (Groningen, 1957).Google Scholar

2 ‘The true Teacher’ (‘Teacher of righteousness’), a name applied both to the founder of the sect and to its coming high-priestly ‘Anointed One’.

3 See my Wood, Ethel M. Lecture, The Dead Sea Scrolls and Christian Doctrine (London, 1966).Google Scholar

4 Ibid. p. 20.

1 See Jonge, M. de and Woude, A. S. van der, ‘IIQ Melchizedek and the New Testament’, N. T.S xii, 301 ff.Google Scholar; David, Flusser, ‘Melchizedek and the Son of Man’, Christian News from Israel, vol. xvii, no. 1 (April 1966).Google Scholar

2 See further below, p. 88.

1 For an excellent discussion of this and related topics, see Flusser, D., ‘The Dead Sea Sect and pre-Pauline Christianity’, in Scripta Hierosolymitana, vol. iv, Aspects of the Dead Sea Scrolls, 2nd ed. (Jerusalem, 1965), pp. 246 ff. See further below, p. 87.Google Scholar

1 Cf. above, p. 84, n. 1.

1 See Repo, Eero, Der Weg als Selbstbezeichnung des Urchristentums: Eine traditionsgeschichtliche und semasiologische Untersuchung (Helsinki, 1964).Google Scholar

2 See also above, p. 82.

1 The Background of the New Testament and its Eschatology, Studies in Honour of Dodd, C. H. (Cambridge, 1956), p. 169.Google Scholar

1 L'Archéologie et les Manuscrits de la Mer Morte (London, 1961)Google Scholar, which I shall refer to as Archéologie, as Driver does.

1 In the course of his discussion of my conclusions, Driver often speaks of the ‘monastery’ of Qumran: thus in ‘quotes’. I am keeping the ‘quotes’, because I have never used the word when writing about the excavations at Qumran, precisely because it represents an inference which archaeology, taken alone, could not warrant.