Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:55:24.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integral inequalities for ovaloids in Euclidean space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Th. Koufogiorgos
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45332, Greece.
Ch. Baikoussis
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45332, Greece.
Get access

Extract

Let M be a smooth surface in Euclidean space E3 and L the Weingarten map. The fundamental forms I1, I2, I3,… on M are defined in terms of L and the usual inner product 〈, 〉 of E3 as follows. If X and Y are in the tangent space TPM of M (Pε M), then I1(X, Y) = 〈X, Y), I2(X, Y) = 〈LX, Y〉, I3(X, Y) = 〈L2X, Y), etc. Moreover, if M is convex, i.e., the Gaussian curvature K = k1k2, where ki, (i = l,2) are the principal curvatures of M, is everywhere positive, then one can also define on M the forms I0(X, Y) = 〈L−1X, Y), I−1,(X, Y) = 〈L−2X, Y), I−2(X, Y) = 〈 L−3X, Y) etc., where L−1 is the inverse of L. Since L is self-adjoint, the forms Im are, for any integer m, symmetric bilinear functions on TPM × TPM. Furthermore Im are C in the sense that if X and Y are vector fields with domain AM, then 〈 LmX, YP = 〉LmXP, YP) is a C real function on A. If the convex surface M is appropriately oriented, then the forms Im define metrics on M, which we also denote by 〈, 〉m (〈, 〉1)≡ 〈, 〉).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chern, S. S.. On special W-surfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 6 (1955), 783786.Google Scholar
2.Hasanis, T.. On convex hypersurfaces in En+1. Colloquium Math, 48 (1984), 4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Schneider, R.. Closed convex hypersurfaces with second fundamental form of constant curvature. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 35 (1972), 230233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Simon, U. and Weinstein, A.. Anwendungen der de Rhamschen Zerlegung auf Probleme der lokalen Flächentheorie. Manuscripta Math., 1 (1969), 139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Singley, D.. Smoothness Theorems for the principal curvatures and principal vectors of a hypersurface. Rocky Mountain 3. Math., 5 (1975), 135144.Google Scholar