Marstrand’s theorem states that applying a generic rotation to a planar set A before projecting it orthogonally to the x-axis almost surely gives an image with the maximal possible dimension $\min(1, \dim A)$. We first prove, using the transversality theory of Peres–Schlag locally, that the same result holds when applying a generic complex linear-fractional transformation in $PSL(2,\mathbb{C})$ or a generic real linear-fractional transformation in $PGL(3,\mathbb{R})$. We next show that, under some necessary technical assumptions, transversality locally holds for restricted families of projections corresponding to one-dimensional subgroups of $PSL(2,\mathbb{C})$ or $PGL(3,\mathbb{R})$. Third, we demonstrate, in any dimension, local transversality and resulting projection statements for the families of closest-point projections to totally-geodesic subspaces of hyperbolic and spherical geometries.

Let $k \geqslant 2$ be an integer. We prove that factorisation of integers into k parts follows the Dirichlet distribution $\mathrm{Dir}\left({1}/{k},\ldots,{1}/{k}\right)$ by multidimensional contour integration, thereby generalising the Deshouillers–Dress–Tenenbaum (DDT) arcsine law on divisors where $k=2$. The same holds for factorisation of polynomials or permutations. Dirichlet distribution with arbitrary parameters can be modelled similarly.

For each central essential hyperplane arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ over an algebraically closed field, let $Z_\mathcal{A}^{\hat\mu}(T)$ denote the Denef–Loeser motivic zeta function of $\mathcal{A}$ . We prove a formula expressing $Z_\mathcal{A}^{\hat\mu}(T)$ in terms of the Milnor fibers of related hyperplane arrangements. This formula shows that, in a precise sense, the degree to which $Z_{\mathcal{A}}^{\hat\mu}(T)$ fails to be a combinatorial invariant is completely controlled by these Milnor fibers. As one application, we use this formula to show that the map taking each complex arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ to the Hodge–Deligne specialization of $Z_{\mathcal{A}}^{\hat\mu}(T)$ is locally constant on the realization space of any loop-free matroid. We also prove a combinatorial formula expressing the motivic Igusa zeta function of $\mathcal{A}$ in terms of the characteristic polynomials of related arrangements.

What is the probability that a random UHF algebra is of infinite type? What is the probability that a random simple AI algebra has at most k extremal traces? What is the expected value of the radius of comparison of a random Villadsen-type AH algebra? What is the probability that such an algebra is $\mathcal{Z}$-stable? What is the probability that a random Cuntz–Krieger algebra is purely infinite and simple, and what can be said about the distribution of its K-theory? By constructing $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebras associated with suitable random (walks on) graphs, we provide context in which these are meaningful questions with computable answers.

We prove that if K is a nontrivial null-homotopic knot in a closed oriented 3–manfiold Y such that $Y-K$ does not have an $S^1\times S^2$ summand, then the zero surgery on K does not have an $S^1\times S^2$ summand. This generalises a result of Hom and Lidman, who proved the case when Y is an irreducible rational homology sphere.

We show that a group that is hyperbolic relative to strongly shortcut groups is itself strongly shortcut, thus obtaining new examples of strongly shortcut groups. The proof relies on a result of independent interest: we show that every relatively hyperbolic group acts properly and cocompactly on a graph in which the parabolic subgroups act properly and cocompactly on convex subgraphs.

Gross and Siebert developed a program for constructing in arbitrary dimension a mirror family to a log Calabi–Yau pair (X, D), consisting of a smooth projective variety X with a normal-crossing anti-canonical divisor D in X. In this paper, we provide an algorithm to practically compute explicit equations of the mirror family in the case when X is obtained as a blow-up of a toric variety along hypersurfaces in its toric boundary, and D is the strict transform of the toric boundary. The main ingredient is the heart of the canonical wall structure associated to such pairs (X, D), which is constructed purely combinatorially, following our previous work with Mark Gross. In the case when we blow up a single hypersurface we show that our results agree with previous results computed symplectically by Aroux–Abouzaid–Katzarkov. In the situation when the locus of blow-up is formed by more than a single hypersurface, due to infinitely many walls interacting, writing the equations becomes significantly more challenging. We provide the first examples of explicit equations for mirror families in such situations.

Let F be a finite extension of ${\mathbb Q}_p$. Let $\Omega$ be the Drinfeld upper half plane, and $\Sigma^1$ the first Drinfeld covering of $\Omega$. We study the affinoid open subset $\Sigma^1_v$ of $\Sigma^1$ above a vertex of the Bruhat–Tits tree for $\text{GL}_2(F)$. Our main result is that $\text{Pic}\!\left(\Sigma^1_v\right)[p] = 0$, which we establish by showing that $\text{Pic}({\mathbf Y})[p] = 0$ for ${\mathbf Y}$ the Deligne–Lusztig variety of $\text{SL}_2\!\left({\mathbb F}_q\right)$. One formal consequence is a description of the representation $H^1_{{\acute{\text{e}}\text{t}}}\!\left(\Sigma^1_v, {\mathbb Z}_p(1)\right)$ of $\text{GL}_2(\mathcal{O}_F)$ as the p-adic completion of $\mathcal{O}\!\left(\Sigma^1_v\right)^\times$.

We obtain examples of smooth projective varieties over ${\mathbb C}$ that violate the integral Hodge conjecture and for which the total Chow group is of finite rank. Moreover, we show that there exist such examples defined over number fields.

Let $\mu$ be a Radon measure on the nth Heisenberg group ${\mathbb{H}}^n$. In this note we prove that if the $(2n+1)$-dimensional (Heisenberg) Riesz transform on ${\mathbb{H}}^n$ is $L^2(\mu)$-bounded, and if $\mu(F)=0$ for all Borel sets with ${\text{dim}}_H(F)\leq 2$, then $\mu$ must have $(2n+1)$-polynomial growth. This is the Heisenberg counterpart of a result of Guy David from [Dav91].

In a 1968 issue of the Proceedings, P. M. Cohn famously claimed that a commutative domain is atomic if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition on principal ideals (ACCP). Some years later, a counterexample was however provided by A. Grams, who showed that every commutative domain with the ACCP is atomic, but not vice versa. This has led to the problem of finding a sensible (ideal-theoretic) characterisation of atomicity.

The question (explicitly stated on p. 3 of A. Geroldinger and F. Halter–Koch’s 2006 monograph on factorisation) is still open. We settle it here by using the language of monoids and preorders.