Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T03:53:04.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where the action isn't

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2012

Michael Lempert
Michael Lempert
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 101 West Hall, 1085 S. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enfield's The anatomy of meaning is a pathbreaking exploration of multimodal communication based on Lao video recordings and fieldwork. Of special interest is his notion of composites, through which he addresses the question of cross-modal integration—how it is that signs in different modalities cohere, speech and gesture being his focus. For whom, to what degree, and through what means do composites coalesce? Does this notion denote a kind of cross-modal orderliness or the achievement of orderliness—perhaps through heuristics and inference-making? As I detail the book's engagement with this issue and compare it with others—especially recent discussions of “textuality” in linguistic anthropology and older structuralist approaches to behavioral events—I suggest that Enfield's notion is best viewed as a methodological operator. It is a notion that performs a kind of methodological displacement, pushing against an entrenched logocentrism while spurring us to view communicative events as multiplex, cross-modal assemblages. (Multi-modal, cross-modal, gesture, interaction, video, Lao)

Type
Review Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 259 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif (1996). Tropic aggression in the Clinton-Dole presidential debate. Pragmatics 7(4):461–97.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1962). How to do things with words. Ed. by Urmson, J. O. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances, language, culture and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Randi A. (1998). Not channels but composite signals: Speech, gesture, diagrams and object demonstrations are integrated in multimodal explanations. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Derry, S. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 321–26. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (1989). Text and textuality. Annual Review of Anthropology 18:95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. (1996). Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In Gumperz, John J. & Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 271–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, Thomas (ed.), Style in language, 350–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature, language, speech, and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Gonzales, Patrick; & Jacoby, Sally (1996). “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A, & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 328–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okrent, A. (2002). A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (Or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, Richard J. (1994). Naturalization of convention. In Parmentier, Richard J. (ed.), Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology, 175–90. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina M. (2005). Participant transposition: Text and trope in Senegalese oral narrative. Narrative Inquiry 15(2):345–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.; Alfred, S. Hayes; Bateson, Mary Catherine; & Indiana University, Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, , and Linguistics, (eds.) (1964). Approaches to semiotics: Cultural anthropology, education, linguistics, psychiatry, psychology; transactions, (Janua linguarum, series maior 15). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. (Language in society) Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1992). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, John (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1997). The improvisational performance of “culture” in real-time discursive practice. In Sawyer, R. Keith (ed.), Creativity in performance, 265–312. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4):193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2004). “Cultural” concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology 45(5):621–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, & Urban, Greg (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Trans. by Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar