Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:37:06.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The people's critical linguistics: Using archival data to investigate responses to linguistic informalisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2020

Joe Spencer-Bennett
Joe Spencer-Bennett*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Joe Spencer-Bennett, English Language and Linguistics, Frankland Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arguments about the sociopolitical significance of the informalisation of English have been central to the critical study of language in society since the 1980s. This article demonstrates that informalisation was also a key concern of ordinary users of British English in the 1980s. Correspondents in the British Mass Observation Project articulated judgements of informalisation that were in many ways continuous with those of academic linguists. The article argues that such critical arguments about language were part of a ‘structure of feeling’ (Raymond Williams) of late twentieth-century Britain. This suggests a rethinking of ordinary language users’ relations to their linguistic experience, not as unthinkingly ‘prescriptivist’, nor as merely ‘commonsensical’, but as exhibiting a nuance which academic linguists would do well to engage with more fully. The article makes the case for the use of social-historical archives in investigations of metalanguage, as a means by which the social significance of language can be better understood. (Critical linguistics, folk linguistics, terms of address, informalisation, synthetic personalisation, prescriptivism)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 283 - 304
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif (2007a). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007b). The object called ‘language’ and the subject of linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics 35(3):217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, Jean (1997). The language web: The power and problem of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul (2010). Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? Gender & Language 4(1):125–49.Google Scholar
Becker, Judith A. (1994). Pragmatic socialization: Parental input to preschoolers. Discourse Processes 17(1):131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Finegan, Edward (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3):487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael (2003). Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In Weiss, Gilbert & Wodak, Ruth (eds.), Critical discourse analysis, 35–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (ed.) (1999). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, & Bulcaen, Chris (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:447–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloome, David; Sheridan, Dorothy; & Street, Brian (1993). Reading Mass Observation writing: Theoretical and methodological issues in researching the Mass Observation archive. The Mass Observation Archive Occasional Papers Series, Occasional Paper 1. Online: http://www.massobs.org.uk/occasional-papers.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1935/2014). Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Gilman, Albert (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in language, 253–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kay (2010). Linguistic cleanliness is next to godliness: Taboo and purism. English Today 26(2):3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (2000). Good to talk: Living and working in a communication culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2010). Language in the service of propaganda. In Joseph, John E. (ed.), Language and politics, vol. 1, 73–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Geer, Boel; Tulviste, Tiia; Mizera, Luule; & Tryggvason, Marja-Terttu (2002). Socialization in communication: Pragmatic socialization during dinnertime in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1757–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor (1997). Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of Linguistics 33(2):255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, & Seoane, Elena (2012). Democratization. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1996). Technologisation of discourse. In Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa & Coulthard, Malcolm (eds.), Texts and practices, 71–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2013). Critical discourse analysis. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2015). Language and power. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger (1996). On critical linguistics. In Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa & Coulthard, Malcolm (eds.), Texts and practices, 3–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo, & Hart, Christopher (2018). Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society 29(5):514–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan (2005). Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public/private. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gleason, Jean Berko; Perlmann, Ricka Y.; & Greif, Esther Blank (1984). What's the magic word: Learning language through politeness routines. Discourse Processes 7(4):493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn (1997). On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Language & Communication 17(3):237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4):473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica, & McElhinny, Bonnie (2017). Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. Plymouth: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Highmore, Ben (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane (2009). The everyday language of white racism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoggart, Richard (1957). The uses of literacy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hunt, Daniel, & Koteyko, Nelya (2015). ‘What was your blood sugar reading this morning?’ Representing diabetes self-management on Facebook. Discourse & Society 26(4):445–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Tom (1978). Mass Observation – A short history. (Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Stencilled Occasional Papers.) Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Online: http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/1810/1/SOP55.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2017). Discourse analysis. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter (2007). Why there is no such thing as ‘critical discourse analysis’. Language & Communication 27:337–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (2004). Language ideologies. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 496–517. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (2003). Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Facchineti, Roberta, Krug, Manfred G., & Palmer, Frank R. (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 223–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, Nick, & Harrison, Alan (2006). Resisting corporate communications: Insights into folk linguistics. Human Relations 59(4):567–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian (2006). Twentieth-century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, Hebert (1964/2002). One-dimensional man. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mass Observation (1989). Summer directive 1989. Directive 29, 19th May 1989. Online: http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/observingthe80s/home/mass-observation/; accessed August 8, 2018.Google Scholar
Mass Observation (2015). Mass Observation project directives. Online: http://www.massobs.org.uk/mass-observation-project-directives; accessed August 21, 2018.Google Scholar
McLaine, Ian (1971). Ministry of morale. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea (1998). Bad language: What are the limits? Online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080715064016/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/research/Bad_lang.pdf; accessed December 21, 2018.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A., & Preston, Dennis R. (2003). Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Observing the 80s (n.d.). Online: http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/observingthe80s/; accessed November 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (2012). Experiencing language. Anthropological Theory 12(2):142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2016). UK population estimates 1838–2015. Online: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/populationbyagegenderandethnicity; accessed February 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Orwell, George (1946/2004). Politics and the English language. In George Orwell, Why I write, 102–20. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Paulston, Christina Bratt (1976). Pronouns of address in Swedish: Social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society 5(3):359–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paveau, Marie-Anne (2011). Do non-linguists practice linguistics? An anti-eliminative approach to folk theories. AILA Review 24(1):40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Michael (2005). Informalization in UK party election broadcasts 1966–97. Language and Literature 14(1):65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (2011). Methods in (applied) folk linguistics: Getting into the minds of the folk. AILA Review 24:15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1994). The language instinct. London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2014). The sense of style. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (2006). Language in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, & Sidnell, Jack (2014). Conversation analysis. In Jaworski, Adam & Coupland, Nikolas (eds.), The discourse reader, 249–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay (1998). Signs and wonders: Interpreting the economy through television. In Bell, Allan & Garrett, Peter (eds.), Approaches to media discourse, 186–219. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Savage, Mike (2007). Changing social class identities in post-war Britain: Perspectives from Mass Observation. Sociological Research Online 12(3):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5):1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer (2017). Talking Donald Trump. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1981). The limits of awareness. (Sociolinguistic working paper 84.) Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef (2001). Explanation, interpretation and critique in the analysis of discourse. Critique of Anthropology 21(1):33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Bennett, Joe (2019) The Ministry of Information and the linguistic design of Britain's World War II propaganda: What archival documents can tell us about political discourse. Discourse & Society. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926519889125.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael (1997). Whorf's children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In Ryan, Ann & Wray, Alison (eds.), Evolving models of language, 100–16. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Synovate UK (2010). Audience attitudes towards offensive language on television and radio. Online: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/27260/offensive-lang.pdf; accessed December 21, 2018.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1993a). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2):249–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1993b). Elite discourse and racism. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and power. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature 4(3):157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1961/2005). Advertising: The magic system. In Raymond Williams, Culture and materialism, 170–95. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, & Meyer, Michael (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1–33. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A., & Schieffelin, Bambi (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1):55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar