Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:19:34.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suzanne Romaine, Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 34.) Cambridge University Press, 1982. Pp. xi + 315.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

William Croft
Affiliation:
Department of LinguisticsStanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Comrie, B., & Keenan, E. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55: 649–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (1985). Indirect object “lowering.” In Niepokuj, M. et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 3951.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1968). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1969). Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Puhvel, J. (ed.), Substance and structure of language. Berkeley: University of California Press. 147203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1974). Studies in the history of linguistics: Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1979). Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1980). On explaining language change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, D. (1979). Strategies of relativization and NP accessibility. Language 55: 352–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution and inherìtance. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D., & Postal, P. (1977). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. In Whistler, K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 394417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar