Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:57:52.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Iraqi women more prestige conscious than men? Sex differentiation in Baghdadi Arabic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Farida Abu-Haidar
Farida Abu-Haidar
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigators have found in Arabic-speaking communities that men's speech, and not women's, approximated the standard variety. More recent studies have challenged the assumption that prestige and standard spoken Arabic are one and the same. These studies have found that there are, in some Arab communities, prestige varieties of spoken Arabic which are not in the direction of standard Arabic, and that, contrary to what had been previously concluded, it is mostly women who speak the prestige dialects. This article, based on an investigation of the speech of a group of Baghdadi men and women, shows that in Baghdad the prestige variety of spoken Arabic is in the direction of the standard, and that women, more than men, tend to favor this variety. Using the findings of a previous research project in Baghdad, the article also draws attention to the fact that in the past, when Baghdadi women did not have the same access to standard Arabic as men, it was men, and not women, who spoke a dialect approximating the standard variety. (Standard literary Arabic, dialectal Arabic, linguistic prestige norms, style shifting)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 471 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abboud, P. F. (1970). Spoken Arabic. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics (vol. 4). The Hague. 439–66.Google Scholar
Abd-el-Jawad, H. R. E. (1981). Lexical and phonological variation in spoken Arabic in Amman. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Abd-el-Jawad, H. R. E. (1986). The emergence of an urban dialect in the Jordanian urban centers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 61(5):53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abd-el-Jawad, H. R. E. (1987). Cross-dialectal variation in Arabic: Competing prestigious forms. Language in Society 16:359–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Haidar, F. (1987). The treatment of the reflexes of /q/ and /k/ in the Muslim dialect of Baghdad. Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 17:41–57.Google Scholar
Abu-Haidar, F. (1988). Male/female linguistic variation in a Baghdad community. In Irvine, A. K., Serjeant, R. B., & Smith, G. R. (eds.), A miscellany of Middle Eastern articles: In memoriam Thomas Muir Johnstone, 1924–83. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Al-Ani, S. (1978). The development and distribution of the Qaaf in Iraq. In Al-Ani, S. (ed.), Readings in Arabic linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 103–12.Google Scholar
Bakir, M. (1986). Sex differences in the approximation to standard Arabic: A case study. Anthropological Linguistics 28(1):3–9.Google Scholar
Blanc, H. (1964). Communal dialects in Baghdad. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, J. P., & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 407–34.Google Scholar
Chambers, J., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982). Linguistic variation and social function. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 153–66.Google Scholar
Diem, W. (1974). Hochsprache und Dialekt im arabischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Elyan, O. H. (1981). Sex-differences in prosodic and paralinguistic features of language. Unpublished M. Phil, dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. (1968). A sociolinguistic study of the pronunciation of three vowels in Detroit speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15:325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Sociolinguistics and communication in small groups. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 203–24.Google Scholar
Holmquist, J. C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society 14:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues 23:8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. H. (1986). Standard and prestige language: A problem in Arabic sociolinguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 28(1): 15–26.Google Scholar
Jahangiri, N., & Hudson, R. A. (1982). Patterns of variation in Tehrani Persian. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 49–63.Google Scholar
Kojak, W. (1983). Language and sex: A case study of a group of educated Syrian speakers of Arabic. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. Language in Society 2:81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J. (1966). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In Lieberson, S. (ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Meiseles, G. (1980). Educated spoken Arabic and the Arabic language continuum. Archivum Linguisticum n.s. 11.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Margrain, S. (1980). Vernacular language loyalty and social network. Language in Society 9:43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1986). What is eduated spoken Arabic? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 61 (5):7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patai, R. (1962). Society, culture, and change in the Middle East. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S., & Reid, E. (1976). Glottal sloppiness? A sociolinguistic view of urban speech in Scotland. Teaching English 9(3): 12–16.Google Scholar
Russell, J. (1982). Networks and sociolinguistic variation in an African urban setting. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold: 125–40.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Cedergren, H. (1971). Some results of a sociolinguistic study of Montreal French. In Darnell, R. (ed.), Linguistic diversity in Canadian society. Edmonton and Champaign: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1986). Applied sociolinguistics: The case of Arabic as a second language. Anthropological Linguistics 28(1):55–72.Google Scholar
Smith, P. M. (1985). Language, the sexes, and society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983). On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. A. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. A., & Fasold, R. W. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. En-glewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar