The two recent discussions of the chronology of Aśoka's
early missionary activities, as described in his
first Minor Rock Edict, came to different
conclusions. For the idea of a 256-day pilgrimage,
which stems ultimately from mistranslation, Falk had
sought to substitute a calculation involving 256
non-consecutive Uposatha nights. Without detailed
refutation of Falk's arguments, Norman rejected this
result and retained the assumption of a date counted
in days from the beginning of a regnal year. Falk's
Vedic and Arthaśāstra material
points, however, in the right direction. A
description of Aśoka as
256-rātra-vyuṣṭo “having spent a
256-day season” would date his proclamation to the
close of an eight-month campaigning season,
corresponding closely with
varṣā-rātra-uṣita Rāma (R
4.19.1), literally ‘having spent the rains season’,
but dating the activity in question to the first day
of autumn. Late Vedic and epic use of
vyuṣṭa and instances of
calculation by binary, apparently solar, weeks of 8
days and months of 32 days (of which eight would
yield 256), suggest that Aśoka was seeking to give
his proselytizing campaign the status of a religious
observance defined in Kṣatriya terms.
Arthaśāstra includes the
proposition that a 32-day military month was used
for administrative purposes in the field.
Just as in rock edicts the phrase
[devānaṃpiyena] …
abhisitena lekhite dates events
to a regnal year, so
[devānaṃpiyena] … vivuṭhena
sāvane dates Aśoka's MRE proclamation,
but with reference to his years of religious
seniority. The additive chronology, more than two
years plus more than one year, suggested by Norman
and upheld by Falk, is supported by the syntax of
the passage. It would tend to associate the MRE with
Aśoka's 13th regnal year. Aśoka's epigraphs imply
that, inspired perhaps by early residence in Ujjain,
he was at first drawing on late Vedic and epic
calendrical motifs, before starting to display a
knowledge of Vinaya calendrical material in the
pillar edicts.