Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
Having procured three manuscripts of this work, I at first proposed to edit the text. But in going through the work for that purpose I soon found that Professor Kielhorn was right in supposing it to be too dependent on Sāyaṇna to deserve publication in full. Under these circumstances Professor Macdonell suggested to me that I should collect all that was of interest in the work. This I have here attempted to do.
page 127 note 1 The Nīti-mañjarī has already been treated of by ProfessorKielhorn, in the Indian Antiquary, v, 116Google Scholar; by ProfessorPeterson, in his Second Report, 1883–1884, p. 8Google Scholar; and in correction of this account by ProfessorKielhorn, in the Göttinger Nachrichten, 1891, p. 181 sqGoogle Scholar.
page 127 note 2 See Indian Antiquary, v, 116.
page 128 note 1 The preface to Aṣṭaka 4 in A, B, C calls him Maḍoḍakulajaḥ, and in Aṣṭaka 5 C has only darbhakulajaḥ.
page 130 note 1 No. 4,183 in his Catalogue.
page 130 note 2 Report for 1883–4, p. 8.
page 130 note 3 Göttinger Nachrichten, 1891, p. 181; Indian Antiquary, vol. v, p. 116.
page 131 note 1 Cf. Burnell, , Vaṃśa-Brāhmaṇa, Pref., p. viiiGoogle Scholar.
page 133 note 1 Rigveda, I. xviii sq.
page 133 note 2 Bühler, , Indische Palaeographle, p. 82Google Scholar; Kielhorn, , Göttinger Nachrichten, 1891, p. 182Google Scholar.
page 133 note 3 Cf Macdonell's edition, pp. 84, 127, 134.
page 133 note 4 Preface, i, 14, and on Ṛigveda I.53. 1.
page 134 note 1 On ṚV. I. 1. 1, 26. 1, 97. 1, 115. 1; II. 12. 1; III. 33. 1, 5, 53. 1, 14; IV. 25. 1; V. 2. 9, 78. 5; VI. 75. 1; VII. 1. 23, 55. 1 sq.; VIII. 21. 18, 91. 1, 95. 7; X. 9. 1, 155. 1.
page 135 note 1 The former reference is not in Jacob's Concordance; the latter is Kauṣītaky Upaniṣad, 3. 1.
page 135 note 2 The passage is not in our text of Manu.
page 135 note 3 Bhagavadgītā, iii, 35.
page 135 note 4 Ib., iii, 12.