No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
The system of writing which we call Linear Elamite was fully developed in the 23rd century B.C., but it seems that it did not survive the last of the 12 rulers of the dynasty of Awan. The name of this king was, in Babylonian, Puzur-Inshushinak. He reigned, according to the middle chronology, from c. 2260 to c. 2225 B.C. From c. 2200 B.C. the Elamites used only the Akkadian cuneiform script which they formerly had employed alongside their own Elamite script.
1 cf. my contribution “Elams Vertrag mit Narām-Sîn von Akkade” in ZA, LVIII, 1967, 66–96.Google Scholar
2 All of them are discussed in ch. I of my book Altiranische Funde und Forschungen, Berlin, 1969.Google Scholar
3 cf. pp. 31–6 in my book The lost world of Elam: Re-creation of a vanished civilization, London, 1972, from which I quote certain passages with kind permission of Messrs. Sidgwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
4 La scrittura proto-elamica. Parte Ia: La scrittura e il contenuto dei testi, Roma, 1971, 205.Google Scholar
5 ibid.
6 op. cit., 130.
7 Brice, W. C., “The writing system of the proto-Elamite account tablets of Susa”, Bull. John Rylands Library, XLV, 1, 1962, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 La scrittura proto-elamica, 19 ff.
9 Decipherment of the proto-Dravidian inscriptions of the Indus civilization: A first announcement, Copenhagen, 1969, 44 f.Google Scholar
10 Persepolis fortification tablets, Chicago, 1969.Google Scholar
11 cf. my book Neue Wege im Altpersischen, Wiesbaden, 1973, 83.Google Scholar
12 AJSL, LVI, 1939, 302, n. 2.Google Scholar
13 Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, N.F. 4, 1971, 21–4.