Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:22:34.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Additions and Corrections to a Bibliography of Symbolic Logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Additions and Corrections
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 49 , Issue S1: A Bibliography of Symbolic Logic (1666-1935). Revised and Expanded Edition , 1984 , pp. 98 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 1984. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 We adopt the following method of transliterating Russian: A as A, B as B, B as V, Γ as G, Д as D, E as É, Ж as Ž, З as Z, И as I, Й as J, I as I, κ as K, IJ as L, M as M, H as N, O as O, ∐ as P, P as R, C as S, T as T, y as U, Φ as F, X as H, Ц as C, Ч as Č, Ш as Š, Щ as ŠČ, Ъ omitted in transliteration, Ы as Y, Ь as ′, Ђ as Ĕ, ∋ as E, Ю as Ú, Я as Á, θ as F.

2 This book, which is not otherwise within the field of the bibliography, is included because of the appearance on pp. 107-113 of the line of thought which afterwards led to the Richard paradox (1351).

3 With the clarification of Zermelo's notion of a definite Eigenschaft and its consequent elimination as a presupposed intuitive idea, the Zermelo set theory may be said first to have attained a degree of exactness comparable to that of the system of Principia mathematica (11116, 1941). A method of doing this is indicated briefly by Fraenkel in 2692, is incorporated in a system of axioms for set theory in 2694, and later applied to the actual development of some topics in set theory ' n 26922. An alternative method is due to Skolem 2475, 10. And see also J. v. Neumann 2992, 5.