Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:36:26.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving one's practice of clinical supervision of guidance officers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Peter Shaw*
Affiliation:
Education Queensland
*
37 Glenview St, Mt Tarcoola, Geraldton WA 6530, email [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the key features of a collaborative qualitative research project led by a senior guidance officer aimed at improving the practice of guidance officer clinical supervision. The research used a constructivist approach and developed personal understandings of clinical supervision by the participants as adult learners. A collaborative process of professional development of clinical supervision skills and knowledge was undertaken as a way of improving practice in the workplace as a part of the guidance supervision practices in a school district. The process was called a “supervision improvement cycle” and was led by the writer as a senior guidance officer and undertaken in collaboration with three guidance officer colleagues, another senior guidance officer acting as critical friend and also two doctoral supervisors. Together the participants formed a “supervision improvement community”. Such a community could be replicated in other work sites and use the “supervision improvement cycle” discussed in this paper as a way of improving a supervisor's clinical practice and by building commitment to regular planned supervision.

Type
Research papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, S. (1994). Rethinking the principles and practice of action research: the tensions of the teacher researcher. Educational Action Research, 2,(3), 383401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Council of Educational Administration NSW Inc and NSW Department of School Education (1996). Collaborative Action Research: Working together for improvement. Lewisham: Training and Development Centre.Google Scholar
Axten, D. (Producer). (1996). Five approaches to Counselling Supervision. (video cassette). (Available from School of Social Science, Q.U.T., Beams Rd, Carseldine, Qld 4034 )Google Scholar
Barletta, J. (1996). Supervision for school counsellors: When will we get what we really need? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, 1, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barret, R.L. & Schmidt, J.J. (1986). School counsellor certification and supervision: Overlooked professional issues. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benshoff, J.M. & Paisley, P.O. (1996). The Structured Peer Consultation Model for School Counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 314318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J.M. (1979). Supervisor Training: A Discrimination Model. Counsellor Education and Supervision, September, 6068.Google Scholar
Bernard, J.M. & Goodyear, R.K. (1992). Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision. Allyn and Bacon: Boston.Google Scholar
Borders, L. D. (1991). A Systematic Approach to Peer Supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 248252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borders, L. D. (1994, September). Learning to think like a supervisor. Paper presented at the conference of the Queensland Guidance and Counselling Association, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Borders, D. & Leddick, G. (1987). Handbook of Counselling Supervision. Alexandria, VA: Association for Counsellor Education and Supervision.Google Scholar
Borders, L.D. & Usher, C.H. (1992). Post degree supervision: Existing and preferred practices. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 594599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. D. & Walter, P.B. (1975). The school counselor, the cactus and supervision. The School Counselor, 23, 103107.Google Scholar
Calhoun, E.A. (1993). Action research: Three approaches. Educational Leadership, 51, (2) (6265)Google Scholar
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, T. (1990). What kind of knowing is critical action research? Theory into Practice, 29, (3) 167173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadds, M. (1993). The feeling of thinking in professional self study. Educational Action Research, 1, (2), 287303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Education (1990, April). Supervision Training Program For Classified Guidance Officers. Queensland: Guidance and Counselling Services, Division of Special Services.Google Scholar
Dick, B. (1997). A beginners guide to action research [On line]. Available at html://www.scu.edu.au/schools/sawd/arr/guide.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dick, B. (1992). Qualitative Action Research: Improving the rigour and economy. In Bruce, C. and Russell, A. (Eds.). Transforming Tomorrow Today: 2nd World Congress in action learning. Brisbane.Google Scholar
Education Queensland (1998a). Position Description: Queensland: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Education Queensland (1998b). Position Description: Queensland: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (1978). What is action research in schools? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, (4), 355357.Google Scholar
Feldman, A. (1994). Erzberger's Dilemma: Validity in action research and sience teacher's need to know. Science Education, 78,(1), 83101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltham, C. & Dryden, W. (1994). Developing Counsellor Supervision. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. (1983). Contracting in supervision: A goal oriented process. The Clinical Supervsor, 1, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, S. (1994). Action research at the school level: possibilities and problems. Educational Action Research, 2, (1), 2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Researcher, 1, (3), 425441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, H. (1993). Behind the Looking Glass: practitioners research – who speaks the problem? Educational Action Research, 1, (2), 257271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, P. & Shohet, R. (1996). Supervision in the helping professionals. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, A.K. (1986). Growth in supervision: Stages of supervisee and supervisor development. In Kaslow, F.W. (Ed.), Supervision and training models, dilemmas and challenges, (pp.5167). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
Hill, C. & O'Grady, K.E. (1985). List of therapist intentions illustrated in a case study and with therapists of varying theoretical orientations. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 32, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, E.L. (1987). Developmental models of supervision: Is it development? Professional psychology: Research and Practice, 18,(3), (209216).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, A.E. (1982). Intentional Interviewing and Counselling. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. (1995, September). Action Research and Communicative Action: Changing Teaching Practices and the Organisation of Educational Work. Contact: Steven Kemmis Research and Consulting, 22 Denman St., East Geelong, Victoria 3219, Australia.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1982). The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Littrell, J.M., Lee-Bordin, N. & Lorenz, J.A. (1979). A developmental framework for counselling supervision. Counsellor Education and Supervision, 19, 119136.Google Scholar
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E. & Delworth, V. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10,(1), 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P., De Bell, C., Kanuha, U. & McLeod, J. (1988). Myths of supervision: Identifying the gaps between theory and practice. Counselor Education and Supervision, 28, 2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P., Sugden, S., Koker, M., Lamendola, F., Maurer, S. & Renninger, S. (1995). A Practical Guide To Informed Consent in Clinical Supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 130138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKernan, J. (1991). Some developments in the methodology of action research: Studies enactment. In Colins, C. & Chippendale, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the first world congress on action research and process management. Volume 1. Brisbane: Acorn Productions.Google Scholar
McMahon, M. (1997, May). A model of supervision. (Available from the author).Google Scholar
McMahon, M. (1994a). Supervision of guidance officers. Connections, 36, 1415.Google Scholar
McMahon, M. (1994b). Understanding different points of view on supervision. Connections, 36, 18.Google Scholar
McMahon, M. & Solas, J. (1996). Perceptions of guidance officers and senior guidance officers about clinical supervision: A preliminary study. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, (1), 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearns, D. (1995). Supervision: the tale of the missing client. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23, (3), 421429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, R. (1994). Participatory Action Research: Issues in Theory and Practice. Educational Action Research, 2, (3), 313337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuller, W.J. & Kell, B.L. (1972). Coping With Conflict: Supervising Counselors and Psychotherapists. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Osborn, C. & Davis, T. (1996). The Supervision Contract: Making It Perfectly Clear. The Clinical Supervisor, 42, 121134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, B. (1994). Supervision, confidence, competence and accountability. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22, (1) 309318.Google Scholar
Queensland Guidance and Counselling Association Inc. (1994). Code of Ethics. Brisbane: Q.G.C.A. Inc.Google Scholar
Reimer, K.M. & Bruce, B. (1993). Building Teacher-Researcher Collaboration: dilemmas and strategies. Educational Action Research, 2, (2), 211221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C.B. & Borders, L.D. (1994). Supervision of school counselors: Administrative, program and counseling. The School Counselor, 41, 149157.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (Ed) (1987). The Reflective Turn. Columbia University: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Skovholt, T.M. & Ronnestad, M.H. (1992) Themes in therapist and counsellor development. Journal of Counselling Psychology and Development, 70, 505515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somekh, B. (1994). Towards inhabiting each others castles: towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. Educational Action Research, 2, (3), 357381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltenberg, C.D. & Delworth, U. (1988). Developmental models of supervision: It is development- A response to Holloway. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, (2) 134137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
Sutton, J.M. & Page, B.J. (1994). Post degree clinical supervision of school counselors. The School Counselor, 42, 3239.Google Scholar
Tripp, D.H. (1990). Socially critical action research. Theory into practice, 29, (3) 158166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, L. (1996, September) Counselling guidelines discussion paper. (Available from the author).Google Scholar
Wechtler, J. (1990). Solution focused supervision. Family Therapy, XVII, (2) 121138.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. (1994). How do I improve the quality of my management? A participatory action research approach. Management learning, 25, (1), 137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. (1995). Action Research: For People and Organisational Change. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1994). A Three Tier Supervision Model. Connections, 36, 2426.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. & Remley, T. (1987). Leadership and guidance: A survey of school counseling supervisors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, R. (1989). Learning from Experience: Principles and Practice in Action Research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1993). Improving learning and teaching through action learning and action research. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, (1), 4858.Google Scholar