Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:58:16.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generalists or Specialists? Guidance Officers in Queensland Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Paul Bramston*
Affiliation:
University of Southern Queensland
Don Rice
Affiliation:
University of Southern Queensland
*
Psychology Department, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350.
Get access

Abstract

The role and training of Queensland guidance officers appears to be set toward the practice end of the scientist-practitioner continuum. Yet data are presented which demonstrate that the expectations placed on many guidance officers are relatively sophisticated and specialised. Particularly in the areas of personal crisis counselling, family support and community-school development, today's guidance officers working in Queensland schools are required to demonstrate considerable specialisation. The profession seems to be facing a choice, attempt to develop into a group of true educational specialists with all the required training, supervision and in-service education or move to become a group of expert general practitioners. Some implications of these two options for the profession are explored.

Type
Research papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albee, G.W. (2000). The Boulder model's fatal flaw. American Psychologist, 55, 247248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashman, A., Gillies, R., & Beavers, S. (1993). Counsellor roles and perceptions of training. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 3, 114.Google Scholar
Avis, J.P. (1982). Counselling: Issues and challenges. Education and Urban Society, 15, 7087. 82Google Scholar
Beavers, S. (1995). An investigation of guidance officer selection criteria. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 5, 1319.Google Scholar
Belar, C.D. (2000). Scientist-Practitioner does not equal Science + Practitioner. American Psychologist, 55, 249250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, L.T. & Baker, D.B. (2000). Boulder at 50. American Psychologist, 55, 233235.Google Scholar
Burnett, P.C. (1997). The future face of school guidance and counselling: What will it look like in 25 years? Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 7, 2333.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D.L. (1979). Involving counselors in the classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 63(431), 123124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, K. (1995). An investigation of perceptions of guidance officers and secondary principals as to present and preferred level of guidance officer practice in secondary schools. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 5, 2131.Google Scholar
Hays, D.C. (1980). The buffalo, the dodo bird, and the whooping crane. School Counselor, 27, 252255.Google Scholar
Partin, R.L. (1993). School counselors' time: Where does it go? The School Counsellor, 40, 274281.Google Scholar
Pine, G.J. (1976). Troubled times for school counseling. Focus on Guidance, 8, 116.Google Scholar
Raimy, V. (1950). Training in clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Strieker, G., & Trierweiler, S.J. (1995). The local clinical scientist: A bridge between science and practice. American Psychologist, 50, 9951002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valine, W.J., Higgins, E.B., & Hatcher, R.B. (1982). Teacher attitudes toward the role of the counselor: An eight-year follow-up study. The School Counselor, 29, 208211.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J., Dawson, P., Lehr, C., Rechly, D., Reynolds, M., & Telzrow, C. (1997). School Psychology: A Blueprint for Training and Practice II. National Association of School Psychologists: BethesdaGoogle Scholar