Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:05:58.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Citizens v. Clients: Working Women and Colonial Reform in Puerto Rico and Belize, 1932–45

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2003

ANNE S. MACPHERSON
Affiliation:
SUNY College, Brockport.

Abstract

Marked differences in mid-twentieth-century reformers' approaches to politically active working women in Belize and Puerto Rico help to explain the emergence of colonial hegemony in the latter, and the rise of mass nationalism in the former. Reformers in both colonies were concerned with working women, but whereas British and Belizean reformers treated them as sexually and politically disordered, and aimed to transform them from militant wage-earners to clients of state social services, US and Puerto Rican reformers treated them as voting citizens with legitimate roles in the economy and labour movement. Although racialised moralism was not absent in Puerto Rico, the populism of colonial reform there helped cement a renegotiated colonial compact, while the non-populist character of reform in Belize – and the wider British Caribbean – alienated working women from the colonial state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author extends her thanks to the JLAS anonymous reviewers, to Sidney Mintz for his comments on an earlier version of this essay at the ‘Comparing Empires’ conference in November 2000 at Johns Hopkins University, and to Francisco Scarano, for the example of his passion for Puerto Rican history.