The spreading characteristics of jets from several asymmetric nozzles,
and a set of
rectangular orifices are compared, covering a jet Mach number range of
0.3–2.0. The
effect of ‘tabs’ for a rectangular and a round nozzle is also
included in the comparison.
Compared to a round jet, the jets from the asymmetric nozzles spread only
slightly
more at subsonic conditions whereas at supersonic conditions, when ‘screech’
occurs,
they spread much more. The dynamics of the azimuthal vortical structures
of the
jet, organized and intensified under the screeching condition, are thought
to be
responsible for the observed effect at supersonic conditions. Curiously,
the jet from a
‘lobed’ nozzle spreads much less at supersonic condition compared
to all other cases;
this is due to the absence of screech with this nozzle. Screech stages
inducing flapping,
rather than varicose or helical, flow oscillation cause a more pronounced
jet spreading.
At subsonic conditions, only a slight increase in jet spreading with the
asymmetric
nozzles contrasts previous observations by others. The present results
show that the
spreading of most asymmetric jets is not much different from that of a
round jet. This
inference is further supported by data from the rectangular orifices. In
fact, jets from
the orifices with small aspect ratio (AR) exhibit virtually no
increase in the spreading.
A noticeable increase commences only when AR is larger than about
10. Thus, ‘shear
layer perimeter stretching’, achieved with a larger AR for
a given cross-sectional area
of the orifice, by itself, proves to be a relatively inefficient mechanism
for increasing
jet spreading. In contrast, the presence of streamwise vortices or ‘natural
excitation’
can cause a significant increase – effects that might explain the
observations in the
previous investigations. Thus far, the biggest increase in jet spreading
is observed with
the tabs. This is true in the subsonic regime, as well as in the supersonic
regime, in
spite of the fact that screech is eliminated by the tabs. The characteristic
spreading of
the tabbed jets is explained by the induced motion of the tab-generated
streamwise
vortex pairs. The tabs, however, incur thrust loss; the flow blockage and
loss in thrust
coefficient, vis-à-vis the spreading increase, are
evaluated for various configurations.