Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:38:22.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On nonlinear wave groups and crest statistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

FRANCESCO FEDELE  and
M. AZIZ TAYFUN
FRANCESCO FEDELE*
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Savannah, Georgia, USA Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Kuwait
M. AZIZ TAYFUN
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Savannah, Georgia, USA Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Kuwait
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a second-order stochastic model of weakly nonlinear waves and develop theoretical expressions for the expected shape of large surface displacements. The model also leads to an exact theoretical expression for the statistical distribution of large wave crests in a form that generalizes the Tayfun distribution (Tayfun, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 85, 1980, p. 1548). The generalized distribution depends on a steepness parameter given by μ = λ3/3, where λ3 represents the skewness coefficient of surface displacements. It converges to the Tayfun distribution in narrowband waves, where both distributions describe the crests of all waves well. In broadband waves, the generalized distribution represents the crests of large waves just as well whereas the Tayfun distribution appears as an upper bound and tends to overestimate them. However, the theoretical nature of the generalized distribution presents practical difficulties in oceanic applications. We circumvent these by adopting an appropriate approximation for the steepness parameter. Comparisons with wind-wave measurements from the North Sea suggest that this approximation allows both distributions to assume an identical form with which we can describe the distribution of large wave crests fairly accurately. The same comparisons also show that third-order nonlinear effects do not appear to have any discernable effect on the statistics of large surface displacements or wave crests.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 620 , 10 February 2009 , pp. 221 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arena, F. 2005 On non-linear very large sea wave groups. Ocean Engng 32 (11–12), 1311–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, F. & Fedele, F. 2002 A family of narrow-band nonlinear stochastic processes for the mechanics of sea waves. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 21, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccotti, P. 1989 On mechanics of irregular gravity waves. Atti Acc. Naz. Lincei Memorie VIII 19, 111–170.Google Scholar
Boccotti, P. 2000 Wave Mechanics for Ocean Engineering. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dysthe, K. B. 1979 Note on a modification to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for application to deep water waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 369, 105–114.Google Scholar
Fedele, F. 2006 Extreme events in nonlinear random seas. ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Engng 128 (1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, F. 2008 Rogue waves in oceanic turbulence. Phys. D 237 (14–17), 2127–2131.Google Scholar
Fedele, F. & Arena, F. 2005 Weakly nonlinear statistics of high non-linear random waves. Phys. Fluids 17 (1), 026601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forristall, G. Z. 2000 Wave crest distributions: observations and second-order theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 30 (8), 1931–1943.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forristall, G. Z. 2007 Comparing hindcasts with measurements from hurricanes Lili, Ivan, and Katrina. In Proc. 10th Inter. Workshop Wave Hindcast. & Forecast, Oahu, Hawaii, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Gramstad, O. & Trulsen, K. 2007 Influence of crest and group length on the occurrence of freak waves. J. Fluid Mech. 582, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. J. 1996 Second-order wave kinematics conditional on a given crest. Appl. Ocean Res. 18, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. J. 2005 Conditional second-order short-crested water waves applied to extreme wave episodes. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebel, D. L. & Dawson, T. H. 1993 Nonlinearity in crest height statistics. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Wave Measurement & Analysis, ASCE, New Orleans, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
Lindgren, G. 1970 Some properties of a normal process near a local maximum. Ann. Math. Statist. 4 (6), 1870–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, G. 1972 Local maxima of Gaussian fields. Arkiv för Matematik 10, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, G. & Rychlik, I. 1991. Slepian models and regression approximations in crossing and extreme value theory. Intl Statist. Rev. 59 (2), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1957 The statistical analysis of a random moving surface. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 966, 321–387.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1963 The effects of non-linearities on statistical distributions in the theory of sea waves. J. Fluid Mech. 17, 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marthinsen, T. & Winterstein, S. R. 1992 On the skewness of random surface waves. In Proc. 2nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE San Francisco, vol. 3, pp. 472–478.Google Scholar
Milder, D. M. 2007 On the leading nonlinear correction to gravity-wave dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, N. & Janssen, P. A. E. M. 2006 On kurtosis and occurrence probability of freak waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 1471–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onorato, M., Osborne, A. R., Serio, L., Cavaleri, L., Brandini, C. & Stansberg, C. T. 2006 Extreme waves, modulational instability and second order theory: wave flume experiments on irregular waves. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 25 (5), 586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M., Gu, D. & Donelan, M. 1993 On the expected structure of extreme waves in a Gaussian sea. I. Theory and SWADE buoy measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 992–1000.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevosto, M. & Forristall, G. Z. 2002 Statistics of wave crests from models vs. measurements. In Proc. 21st OMAE Conf. Oslo, Paper No. OMAE2002-28443, ASME.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevosto, M., Krogstad, H. E. & Robin, A. 2000 Probability distributions for maximum wave and crest heights. Coastal Engng 40, 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychlik, I. 1987 Joint distribution of successive zero crossing distances for stationary Gaussian processes. J. Appl. Prob. 24, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, J. N. & Dean, R. G. 1979 Development and evaluation of a procedure for simulating a random directional second order sea surface and associated wave forces. Ocean Engng Rep. No. 20, Civil Engineering Department, University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
Socquet-Juglard, H., Dysthe, K., Trulsen, K., Krogstad, H. E. & Liu, J. 2005 Probability distributions of surface gravity waves during spectral changes. J. Fluid Mech. 542, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srokozs, M. A. & Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1986 On the skewness of sea-surface elevation. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 1980 Narrow-band nonlinear sea waves. J. Geophys. Res. 85 (C3), 1548–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 1986 On narrow-band representation of ocean waves. Part I. Theory. J. Geophys. Res. 91 (C6), 7743–7752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 1994 Distributions of envelope and phase in weakly nonlinear random waves. J. Engng Mech. 120, 1009–1025.Google Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 2006 Statistics of nonlinear wave crests and groups. Ocean Engng 33 (11–12), 1589–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 2008 Distributions of envelope and phase in wind waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2754–2800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. & Lo, J.-M. 1990 Non-linear effects on wave envelope and phase. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engng 116, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. & Fedele, F. 2007 a Expected shape of extreme waves in storm seas. In Proc. 26th OMAE Conf., San Diego, Paper No. OMAE2007-29073, ASME.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. & Fedele, F. 2007 b Wave-height distributions and nonlinear effects. Ocean Engng 34, 1631–1649. Proc. 25th OMAE Conf., Hamburg, Paper No. OMAE2007-29073, ASME.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. & Fedele, F. 2008 Envelope and phase statistics of large waves. In Proc. 27th OMAE Conf., Estoril, Paper No. OMAE2008-57219, ASME.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tick, L. J. 1959 A nonlinear random wave model of gravity waves. J. Math. Mech. 8, 643–652.Google Scholar
Tromans, P. S. & Vanderschuren, L. 2004 A spectral response surface method for calculating crest elevation statistics. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Engng 126, 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinje, T. & Haver, S. 1994 On the non-Gaussian structure of ocean waves. In Proc. BOSS'94, Boston, vol. 2, 453–479.Google Scholar
Winterstein, S. R. 1988 Nonlinear vibration models for extremes and fatigue. J. Engng Mech. 114, 1772–1790.Google Scholar