Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:40:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear dynamics of viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow: effect of elasticity on pattern selection, molecular conformation and drag

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

D. G. THOMAS ,
B. KHOMAMI  and
R. SURESHKUMAR
D. G. THOMAS
Affiliation:
Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Center for Materials Innovation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
B. KHOMAMI
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
R. SURESHKUMAR*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Center for Materials Innovation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three-dimensional and time-dependent simulations of viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow of dilute polymer solutions are performed using a fully implicit parallel spectral time-splitting algorithm to discover flow patterns with various spatio-temporal symmetries, namely rotating standing waves (RSWs), disordered oscillations (DOs) and solitary vortex structures referred to as oscillatory strips (OSs) and diwhirls (DWs). A detailed account of the impact of flow transitions on molecular conformation and viscoelastic stress, velocity profiles, hydrodynamic drag force and energy spectra of time-dependent flow states is presented. Overall, predicted pattern selection and flow features compare very favourably with experimental observations. For elasticity number E, that signifies the ratio of elastic to viscous forces, >0.1, and when the shear rate (cylinder rotation speed) is increased above the linear stability threshold, the circular Couette flow (CCF) becomes unstable to RSWs which are characterized by a checkerboard-like pattern in the space–time plot of radial velocity, implying symmetry between inflow/outflow (I/O) regions. As the shear rate is further increased, perturbations that break the I/O symmetry are amplified leading to DOs and/or flame-like patterns with spectral mechanical energy transfer reminiscent of elastically induced low-Reynolds-number turbulence. However, when the shear rate is decreased from those at which such chaotic states are observed, the radially inward acting polymer body force created by flow-induced molecular stretching causes the development of narrow inflow regions surrounded by much broader weak outflow domains. This promotes the formation of solitary vortex structures, which can be stationary and axisymmetric (DWs) or time-dependent (OSs). The dynamics of the formation of these structures by merging and coalescence of vortex pairs and the implication of such events on instantaneous hydrodynamic force are studied. For O(1) values of E, OSs and DWs appear approximately at constant values of the We, defined as the ratio of polymer relaxation time to the inverse shear rate in the gap. As shear rate is decreased further, DWs decay to CCF although at We values less than the linear stability threshold. The flow transitions are hysteretic with respect to We, as evidenced by a plot of drag force versus We.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 620 , 10 February 2009 , pp. 353 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Mubaiyedh, U. A., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 1999 Influence of energetics on the stability of Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 11, 3217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Mubaiyedh, U. A., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2000 Linear stability of viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow: influence of fluid rheology and energetics. J. Rheol. 44, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Mubaiyedh, U. A., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2002 Nonlinear stability analysis of viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow in the presence of viscous heating. Phys. Fluids. 14, 1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andereck, C. D., Liu, S. S. & Swinney, H. L. 1986 Flow regimes in a circular Couette system with independently rotating cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avgousti, M. & Beris, A. N. 1993a Non-axisymmetric modes in the viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 50, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avgousti, M. & Beris, A. N. 1993b Viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow: bifurcation analysis in the presence of symmetries. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 443, 17.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, B. M. & Muller, S. J. 1995 Flow visualization of the elastic Taylor–Couette instability in Boger fluids. Rheol. Acta 34, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, B. M. & Muller, S. J. 1997 Flow regimes in model viscoelastic fluid in a circular Couette system with independently rotating cylinders. Phys. Fluids 9, 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, B. M. & Muller, S. J. 1999 Axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric elastic and inertio-elastic instabilities in Taylor–Couette flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 83, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. F., Curtiss, C. F., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, vols. 1 and 2, 2nd edn.John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydrodynamic Stability. Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Chossat, P. & Iooss, G. 1994 The Couette-Taylor Problem. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumeyrolle, O., Mutabazi, I., & Grisel, M. 2002 Experimental study of inertioelastic Couette–Taylor instability modes in dilute and semidilute polymer solutions. Phys. Fluids. 14, 1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giesekus, H. 1968 Non linear effects in the flow of visco-elastic fluids through slits and holes. Rheol. Acta. 7, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 1996 Couette–Taylor flow in a dilute polymer solution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 1997 Solitary vortex pairs in viscoelastic Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 1998 a Elastic vs. inertial instability in a polymer solution flow. Europhys. Lett. 43, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 1998 b Mechanism of elastic instability in Couette flow of polymer solutions: experiment. Phys. Fluids 10, 2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 2000 Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow. Nature 405, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 2004 Elastic turbulence in curvilinear flows of polymer solutions. New J. Phys. 6, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housiadas, K. D. & Beris, A. N. 2004 An efficient fully implicit spectral scheme for DNS of turbulent viscoelastic channel flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 122, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1974 Convection of a passive scalar by a quasi-uniform random straining field. J. Fluid. Mech. 64, 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K. A. & Graham, M. D. 2000 Solitary coherent structures in viscoelastic shear flow: computation and mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, K. A. & Graham, M. D. 2001 Finite-amplitude solitary states in viscoelastic shear flow: computation and mechanism. J. Fluid Mech. 443, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. G., Shaqfeh, E. S. G. & Muller, S. J. 1990 A purely elastic instability in Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. F., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2006 Influence of rheological parameters on polymer-induced turbulent drag reduction. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 140, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, S. J., Larson, R. G. & Shaqfeh, E. S. G. 1989 A purely elastic transition in Taylor–Couette flow. Rheol. Acta 28, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, R. G. & Philips, T. N. 2002 Computational Rheology. Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renardy, M., Renardy, Y., Sureshkumar, R. & Beris, A. N. 1996 Hopf–Hopf and steady-Hopf mode interactions in the Taylor–Couette flow of an upper convected Maxwell liquid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 63, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, V. & Groisman, A. 1998 Elastic versus inertial instability in Couette–Taylor flow of a polymer solution: Review. Phils. Mag. B 78, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. A., Waleffe, F. & Graham, M. D. 2002 Toward a structural understanding of turbulent drag reduction: nonlinear coherent states in viscoelastic shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sureshkumar, R., Beris, A. N. & Avgousti, M. 1994 Non-axisymmetric subcritical bifurcations in viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 447, 135.Google Scholar
Sureshkumar, R., Beris, A. N. & Handler, R. A. 1997 Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent channel flow of a polymer solution. Phys. Fluids. 9, 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1923 Stability of a viscous liquid contained between rotating cylinders. Phils. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 223, 289.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. G., Al-Mubaiyedh, U. A., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2006 a Time-dependent simulations of non-axisymmetric patterns in Taylor–Couette flow of dilute polymer solutions. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 138, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. G., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2006 b Pattern formation in Taylor–Couette flow of dilute polymer solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 054501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, J. M. & Muller, S. J. 2000 Viscous heating and the stability of Newtonian and viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, J. M. & Muller, S. J. 2003 Experimental studies on the effect of viscous heating on the hydrodynamic stability of viscoelastic Taylor–Couette flow. J. Rheol. 47, 1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar