Dear Editor,
Kemeny’s constant for infinite DTMCs is infinite
Consider a positive recurrent discrete-time Markov chain ${(X_n)}_{n \ge 0}$ with (countable) state space $\mathcal{S}$ . For $x\in \mathcal{S}$ , define the positive hitting time $T_x=\inf\{n\ge 1\colon X_n=x\}$ and the hitting time $\theta_x=\inf\{n\ge 0\colon X_n=x\}$ . Let $\mathbb{P}_x$ denote the law of the process started from state x, and let $\mathbb{E}_x$ denote the corresponding expectation. It was observed by Kemeny and Snell [Reference Kemeny and Snell3] that, when $\mathcal{S}$ is finite, the expected hitting time of a random stationary target, i.e. the quantity
does not depend on x. (Here ${\pi}=(\pi_y)_{y \in \mathcal{S}}$ is the stationary distribution for the chain.) Thus, the quantity $\kappa=\kappa_x$ in (1) is called Kemeny’s constant. Considerable effort has been devoted to giving an ‘intuitive’ proof of this result. In [Reference Bini, Hunter, Latouche, Meini and Taylor1] it was argued that it is more natural to consider the quantity
Note that $\mathbb{E}_x[\theta_y]=\indic{ y\ne x}\mathbb{E}_x[T_y]$ , from which it follows that $\kappa_x=1+\omega_x$ (since $\pi_x\mathbb{E}_x[T_x]=1$ ). For finite $\mathcal{S}$ , Hunter [Reference Hunter2] established the sharp bound $\kappa\ge (|\mathcal{S}|+1)/2$ (the bound is achieved by the directed non-random walk on the cycle). It was conjectured in [1, p. 1031] that $\kappa$ is infinite for any infinite state chain. In this note we verify this conjecture.
Theorem 1. For an irreducible positive recurrent, discrete-time Markov chain with infinite state space and for any $x\in\mathcal{S}$ , we have $\kappa_x = \smash{\sum_{y\in\mathcal{S}} \pi_y \mathbb{E}_x[T_y]} = \infty$ .
This theorem is an immediate consequence of the following result.
Lemma 1. Let $\mathcal{S}$ be finite or infinite. Then, for every $x,y\in \mathcal{S}$ , $\mathbb{E}_x[T_y]\ge \pi_x/(2\pi_y)$ .
Proof. We first prove by induction on $n\ge 0$ that $\mathbb{P}_x(X_n=y) \le {\pi_y}/{\pi_x}$ for every x,y. The case $n=0$ is trivial (for both $x=y$ and $x\ne y$ ). For $n\ge 1$ , we have
where $( p_{w,z})_{w,z \in \mathcal{S}}$ are the one-step transition probabilities, and we have used the induction hypothesis and the full balance equations. Using (2), we have
Therefore, $\mathbb{P}_x(T_y>n)\ge 1-n{\pi_y}/{\pi_x}$ , and
The last step uses the fact that, for $a\ge 0$ ,
Acknowledgements
OA was supported in part by NSERC. MH was supported by a Future Fellowship grant (no. FT160100166) from the Australian Research Council.