Dear Editor,
Kemeny’s constant for infinite DTMCs is infinite
Consider a positive recurrent discrete-time Markov chain
${(X_n)}_{n \ge 0}$
with (countable) state space
$\mathcal{S}$
. For
$x\in \mathcal{S}$
, define the positive hitting time
$T_x=\inf\{n\ge 1\colon X_n=x\}$
and the hitting time
$\theta_x=\inf\{n\ge 0\colon X_n=x\}$
. Let
$\mathbb{P}_x$
denote the law of the process started from state x, and let
$\mathbb{E}_x$
denote the corresponding expectation. It was observed by Kemeny and Snell [Reference Kemeny and Snell3] that, when
$\mathcal{S}$
is finite, the expected hitting time of a random stationary target, i.e. the quantity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d79d/7d79d73aa80d6c4f3c79fb930d8c9748e54ff813" alt=""
does not depend on x. (Here
${\pi}=(\pi_y)_{y \in \mathcal{S}}$
is the stationary distribution for the chain.) Thus, the quantity
$\kappa=\kappa_x$
in (1) is called Kemeny’s constant. Considerable effort has been devoted to giving an ‘intuitive’ proof of this result. In [Reference Bini, Hunter, Latouche, Meini and Taylor1] it was argued that it is more natural to consider the quantity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89fa4/89fa442ea0e0b1ae33dcd9f31311e2f2bf1c6530" alt=""
Note that
$\mathbb{E}_x[\theta_y]=\indic{ y\ne x}\mathbb{E}_x[T_y]$
, from which it follows that
$\kappa_x=1+\omega_x$
(since
$\pi_x\mathbb{E}_x[T_x]=1$
). For finite
$\mathcal{S}$
, Hunter [Reference Hunter2] established the sharp bound
$\kappa\ge
(|\mathcal{S}|+1)/2$
(the bound is achieved by the directed non-random walk on the cycle). It was conjectured in [1, p. 1031] that
$\kappa$
is infinite for any infinite state chain. In this note we verify this conjecture.
Theorem 1. For an irreducible positive recurrent, discrete-time Markov chain with infinite state space and for any
$x\in\mathcal{S}$
, we have
$\kappa_x =
\smash{\sum_{y\in\mathcal{S}} \pi_y \mathbb{E}_x[T_y]} = \infty$
.
This theorem is an immediate consequence of the following result.
Lemma 1. Let
$\mathcal{S}$
be finite or infinite. Then, for every
$x,y\in \mathcal{S}$
,
$\mathbb{E}_x[T_y]\ge
\pi_x/(2\pi_y)$
.
Proof. We first prove by induction on
$n\ge 0$
that
$\mathbb{P}_x(X_n=y) \le
{\pi_y}/{\pi_x}$
for every x,y. The case
$n=0$
is trivial (for both
$x=y$
and
$x\ne y$
). For
$n\ge 1$
, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9320e/9320ecce59d16d95ca4b64107a41ac3ee15834a4" alt=""
where
$( p_{w,z})_{w,z \in \mathcal{S}}$
are the one-step transition probabilities, and we have used the induction hypothesis and the full balance equations. Using (2), we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce354/ce354e37bb659195bcb958c923d4ef681c73b99c" alt=""
Therefore,
$\mathbb{P}_x(T_y>n)\ge 1-n{\pi_y}/{\pi_x}$
, and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4aac/e4aac73433790d01eec684603690385f2f2f68b1" alt=""
The last step uses the fact that, for
$a\ge 0$
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e888/4e8882b07186636e02c4d04cc3d75b2965da1178" alt=""
Acknowledgements
OA was supported in part by NSERC. MH was supported by a Future Fellowship grant (no. FT160100166) from the Australian Research Council.