Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:23:04.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in grazing management. III The behaviour of dairy cows grazed under the close-folding and rotational systems of management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Waite ,
W. B. MacDonald  and
W. Holmes
R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
W. B. MacDonald
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Two groups, each of six Ayrshire dairy cows, have been watched in the field for a total of twentytwo 24 hr. periods during the months May to September. No supplementary foods were fed at any time. One group grazed under a system of close-folding and the other in small rotational paddocks.

2. The effect of the different systems of management was small. It was clear, however, that closefolding increased the time spent in grazing and decreased the weight of herbage eaten. The milk yields from both groups were very similar.

3. A very constant pattern of behaviour over the 24 hr. period, similar for both groups, was observed. The most prolonged grazing period always occurred immediately after the cows returned from evening milking.

4. The amount of grazing during the hours of darkness was small at all times of the season but tended to increase as the evenings shortened and the nights lengthened. The cessation of evening grazing was closely linked with the fall of darkness at all times of the year.

5. The activities during the ‘day’ period were less regular but, nevertheless, showed a marked division into three main spells of grazing, of which one occurred immediately after morning milking, separated by two main spells of rest.

6. Stage of lactation, individual milk yield and live weight appeared to have no direct relation to the amount of time spent in grazing. Cows watched in both 1949 and 1950 grazed for very similar times despite differences in their stage of lactation.

7. Increasing defoliation of the paddock resulted in an increased grazing time by the rotationally grazed cows.

8. Close-folded cows grazed for a shorter time on herbage of low moisture content than on herbage of high moisture content, whilst eating virtually the same weight of dry matter.

9. Climatic changes to the extent met with in south-west Scotland had only a limited effect on the general pattern of grazing.

10. The physiological activities of dunging, urinating and drinking showed only small day to day variations.

11. The distance walked during grazing in the 24 hr. by one individual cow from each group showed only a slightly longer track for the rotationally grazed animal, the average distance being about 2000 yards.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1-2 , January 1951 , pp. 163 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. & Johnstone, V. W. (1949). Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying, p. 25.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & French, T. H. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cory, V. L. (1927). Bull. Tex. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 367.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. M. (1928). Tech. Bull. N. H. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 35.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Waite, R., Fergusson, D. L. & Campbell, Jean, I. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone-Wallace, D. B. (1948). J. Farmers' Cl. pt. 1.Google Scholar
Johnstone-Wallace, D. B. & Kennedy, K. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, P. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Jones, M. J. (1926). Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. Ser. H, no. 5.Google Scholar
Watte, R., Holmes, W., Campbell, Jean, I. & Fergusson, D. L. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watte, R., Holmes, W. & Boyd, J. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1942). Bull. Minist. Agric., Land., no. 124. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar