Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:34:25.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Price Transmission in the Catfish Industry with Specific Emphasis on the Role of Processing Cooperatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

James C. O. Nyankori
James C. O. Nyankori*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture Economics, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper presents the implications of farmer-owned processing cooperatives for pricing in the catfish industry and tests hypotheses about the nature of price transmission in the catfish industry. The results of the linear feedback model indicate that causal relationships exist between farm and wholesale prices in the catfish industry. The direction of causality for both frozen and processed whole catfish run from farm to wholesale level.

Keywords

cooperativespricingwholesaleretaillinear feedbackcausality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , July 1991 , pp. 247 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. “Fitting Autoregressive Models for Prediction.” Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 21 (1969):243–247.Google Scholar
American Agricultural Economics Association. Federal Milk Marketing Orders: A Review of Research on Their Economic Consequences. Occasional Paper No. 3. June 1986.Google Scholar
Backman, J. Price Practices and Price Policies. N.Y.: The Ronald Press Company, 1953.Google Scholar
Blackledge, R. “Delta's Pride: Catfish Producers Build Successful Mississippi Co-op.” Farmer Cooperatives. Feb. 1986, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
Faminow, M.D. “Analysis of the Lead-Lag Structure of Two Wholesale Beef Price Quotes Using Residual Cross Correlation.” North Central Agr. Econ., 3(1981):89–94.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. “Measurements of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 77(1982):304–313.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods.” Econometrics, 37(1969):424–438.Google Scholar
Hinote, S. I. “The Status of the Farm-Raised Catfish Industry in the United States.” Aquaculture Digest. 12(1987): 1–3.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, Henry W, and Forker, Olan D.. “Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):591–599.Google Scholar
Marsh, John M. and Brester, Gary W.. “Short-Term Adjustments in Yellow Sheet Carcass Prices for Red Meats.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):591–599.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen E. “Univariate Residual Cross-Correlation Analysis: An Application to Beef Prices.” North Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 1(1979):141–146.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. A. “Comment.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 77(1982):315–316.Google Scholar
Takayama, T. and Judge, G. G.. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Aquaculture Outlook and Situation. AS-3, April, 1982.Google Scholar