Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:56:15.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why is Toru Hashimoto Called ‘a Japanese version of Trump’ or ‘Hitler’? A Linguistic Examination of Hashimoto's Attack on His Opponents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2018

MASAKI SHIBATA
MASAKI SHIBATA*
Affiliation:
University of New South [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The former Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto is the focus of much public attention in Japan. He is a polarizing figure who is both liked and disliked in equal measures, and his political character, including his argumentative approach, has been widely discussed by the Japanese and international media, as well as within academic research. For example, the Japan Times labelled his speech style as ‘a Japanese version of Donald Trump and the former Tokyo mayor, Shintaro Ishihara, said Hashimoto's speech is like ‘Hitler's’. This study examines the differences between Hashimoto's rhetoric and that of other Japanese politicians. Of the various tactics involved in the argumentative strategy of Hashimoto, this study specifically focuses on his attacking of opponents, which is one of the common and important tactics used in political debate. This study analyses the three linguistic approaches used in political debate: the policies or character of the target; the evaluative meanings of attack, and negotiation used to reduce the assertiveness of attack. The data were drawn from a televised political debate, in which Hashimoto was required to debate with three opponents who opposed his points of view. This study demonstrates that the target and the evaluative meanings behind Hashimoto's attacks were not remarkably different from the other politicians. However, Hashimoto did not use negotiation and and he was more assertive in presenting criticisms while the other politicians’ criticisms were mediated by negotiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 23 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Blas-Arroyo, J.L. (2003), ‘Perdo9neme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González: form and function of politic verbal behavior in faceto-face Spanish political debates. Discourse and Society 14 (4), 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L. (2014), Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Blankenship, K.L., and Holtgraves, T. (2005), The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 3–24.Google Scholar
Blankenship, K., and Craig, T. (2007), Language and persuasion: Tag questions as powerless speech or as interpreted in context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 112–118.Google Scholar
Collins, H.H. (1987), Cobuild English Language Dictionary. Glasgow: Collins Google Scholar
Feldman, O., Kinoshita, K., and Bull, P. (2015), Culture or communicative conflict? The analysis of equivocation in broadcast Japanese political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 65–89.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A. (2008), ‘And I think that is a very straightforward way of dealing with it’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27: 384–396.Google Scholar
García-Pastor, M.D. (2008), Political campaign debates as zero-sum games: impoliteness and power in candidates’ exchanges. In: Bousfield, D., Locher, M.A. (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 100–123.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004), Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn, London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005), Metadiscourse. London: Continuum Google Scholar
Jalilifar, A., and Alavi-Nia, M. (2012), We are surprised; wasn't Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse and Communication, 6 (2), 135–161.Google Scholar
Kanaya, T. (2004), Nihongo ni wa shugo wa iranai. Tokyo: Koodansha Publisher.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975), Language and Women's Place, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R., and Rose, D. (2003), Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. NY/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R., and White, P.R. (2005), The language of evaluation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (2012), Hashimoto toru no kehiki de makenai hanashikata no gijutsu. Tokyo: Soogoo hooree Publisher.Google Scholar
Merritt, S. (1984), Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising, 13, 27–38.Google Scholar
Mukoudani, T. (2013), Hashimoto shiki, zettai makenai kenka jutsu. Tokyo: Shoodensha Publisher Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R. (1986), Mood and Modality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, A. (2011), Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–807.Google Scholar
Shleppegrell, M.J. (2004), The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. London/NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C.J. (1975), Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal, 26, 279–286.Google Scholar
Ueno, M., and Kehler, A. (2010), The interpretation of null and overt pronouns in Japanese: Grammatical and pragmatic factors. In S. Ohlsson and R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2057–2062).Google Scholar
White, P.R. (1998), Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
White, P.R.R. (2003), Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of language of intersubjective stance. Text 23 (2), 259–284.Google Scholar

Newspaper articles

Abe-shushoo, Hashimoto Toru-shi to Kaishoku Kenpoo-Kaisee ni muke Iken Kookan ka. ‘The Prime Minister Abe meets Mr. Toru Hashimoto for the dinner meeting to exchange their opinions for constitutional reform.’ (2016, July, 30) Asahi Newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.asahi.com/articles/ASJ7Z62CCJ7ZUTFK008.html Google Scholar
Hashimoto Toru wa Wakai Toki no Tanaka Kakuee. . .Shushoo ni naru kanoo see ga aaru. ‘Toru Hashimoto has a possibility to be a young version of the former Prime Minister Kakuee Tanaka’ (2014, December 16). Sankee Newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.sankei.com/politics/news/141216/plt1412160044-n4.html Google Scholar
Johnston, E. (2016, March 19). A Japanese version of Trump isn't so far-fetched. The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/03/19/national/japanese-version-trump-isnt-far-fetched/ Google Scholar
Johnston, E. (2012, October, 30). The world according to Hashimoto. The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2012/10/30/issues/the-world-according-to-toru-hashimoto/#.WES5RdV96Uk Google Scholar
Oosaka Tokoosoo no Zehi: Toohyoo Hajimaru Kako Saidai-kibo no Juumin Toohyoo ni.’ ‘Decision for the Osaka Metropolis Plan: the biggest referendum ever.’ (2015, May, 17) Asahi Newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/2015/05/16/osaka-metropolis-elction_n_7298956.html.Google Scholar